Introduction : the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong's new political dispensation

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This introduction describes some of the background of Hong Kong's current situation, and sets the scene for the papers that follow. More substantively, it examines a debate that has intensified since Mao's death over the nature of the People's Republic of China (PRC). What kind of state is it? Where is it heading? Does it yet permit an embryonic 'civil society'? We will see that Sinologists and other commentators have different answers to these questions, a dissonance that reveals how fast the PRC is changing. Even so, these changes do not as yet suggest that the PRC is moving in a liberal or democratic direction. The dangers for Hong Kong's freedoms are evident. The Chinese Communist Party leadership has a notably extractive, utilitarian view of Hong Kong's value. Such a view not only rules out freedom as self-mastery ('positive' liberty); it also curtails the freedom that Hong Kong's new institutional arrangements are supposed to enshrine: freedom from interference ('negative' liberty). As recent events have shown, the PRC retains the capacity and will to overrule arbitrarily the decisions of Hong Kong's courts. In turn, this reveals the key weakness of a view of liberty that concentrates on the area of its exercise as distinct from its source. Hong Kong's political liberties are perpetually vulnerable so long as they depend on the Sovereign's authoritarian toleration. The absence of republican freedom (as nondomination) is the Achilles heel of the 'one country, two systems' formula.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)103-125
    Number of pages23
    JournalCitizenship Studies
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2001

    Fingerprint

    Hong Kong
    China
    civil society
    leadership
    communist party
    freedom
    interference
    death
    event
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{b28f04ed0ad74f1bbf11a6a3f440c735,
    title = "Introduction : the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong's new political dispensation",
    abstract = "This introduction describes some of the background of Hong Kong's current situation, and sets the scene for the papers that follow. More substantively, it examines a debate that has intensified since Mao's death over the nature of the People's Republic of China (PRC). What kind of state is it? Where is it heading? Does it yet permit an embryonic 'civil society'? We will see that Sinologists and other commentators have different answers to these questions, a dissonance that reveals how fast the PRC is changing. Even so, these changes do not as yet suggest that the PRC is moving in a liberal or democratic direction. The dangers for Hong Kong's freedoms are evident. The Chinese Communist Party leadership has a notably extractive, utilitarian view of Hong Kong's value. Such a view not only rules out freedom as self-mastery ('positive' liberty); it also curtails the freedom that Hong Kong's new institutional arrangements are supposed to enshrine: freedom from interference ('negative' liberty). As recent events have shown, the PRC retains the capacity and will to overrule arbitrarily the decisions of Hong Kong's courts. In turn, this reveals the key weakness of a view of liberty that concentrates on the area of its exercise as distinct from its source. Hong Kong's political liberties are perpetually vulnerable so long as they depend on the Sovereign's authoritarian toleration. The absence of republican freedom (as nondomination) is the Achilles heel of the 'one country, two systems' formula.",
    author = "Peter BAEHR",
    year = "2001",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1080/13621020120053545",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "103--125",
    journal = "Citizenship Studies",
    issn = "1362-1025",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Introduction : the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong's new political dispensation. / BAEHR, Peter.

    In: Citizenship Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, 07.2001, p. 103-125.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Introduction : the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong's new political dispensation

    AU - BAEHR, Peter

    PY - 2001/7

    Y1 - 2001/7

    N2 - This introduction describes some of the background of Hong Kong's current situation, and sets the scene for the papers that follow. More substantively, it examines a debate that has intensified since Mao's death over the nature of the People's Republic of China (PRC). What kind of state is it? Where is it heading? Does it yet permit an embryonic 'civil society'? We will see that Sinologists and other commentators have different answers to these questions, a dissonance that reveals how fast the PRC is changing. Even so, these changes do not as yet suggest that the PRC is moving in a liberal or democratic direction. The dangers for Hong Kong's freedoms are evident. The Chinese Communist Party leadership has a notably extractive, utilitarian view of Hong Kong's value. Such a view not only rules out freedom as self-mastery ('positive' liberty); it also curtails the freedom that Hong Kong's new institutional arrangements are supposed to enshrine: freedom from interference ('negative' liberty). As recent events have shown, the PRC retains the capacity and will to overrule arbitrarily the decisions of Hong Kong's courts. In turn, this reveals the key weakness of a view of liberty that concentrates on the area of its exercise as distinct from its source. Hong Kong's political liberties are perpetually vulnerable so long as they depend on the Sovereign's authoritarian toleration. The absence of republican freedom (as nondomination) is the Achilles heel of the 'one country, two systems' formula.

    AB - This introduction describes some of the background of Hong Kong's current situation, and sets the scene for the papers that follow. More substantively, it examines a debate that has intensified since Mao's death over the nature of the People's Republic of China (PRC). What kind of state is it? Where is it heading? Does it yet permit an embryonic 'civil society'? We will see that Sinologists and other commentators have different answers to these questions, a dissonance that reveals how fast the PRC is changing. Even so, these changes do not as yet suggest that the PRC is moving in a liberal or democratic direction. The dangers for Hong Kong's freedoms are evident. The Chinese Communist Party leadership has a notably extractive, utilitarian view of Hong Kong's value. Such a view not only rules out freedom as self-mastery ('positive' liberty); it also curtails the freedom that Hong Kong's new institutional arrangements are supposed to enshrine: freedom from interference ('negative' liberty). As recent events have shown, the PRC retains the capacity and will to overrule arbitrarily the decisions of Hong Kong's courts. In turn, this reveals the key weakness of a view of liberty that concentrates on the area of its exercise as distinct from its source. Hong Kong's political liberties are perpetually vulnerable so long as they depend on the Sovereign's authoritarian toleration. The absence of republican freedom (as nondomination) is the Achilles heel of the 'one country, two systems' formula.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2149

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034926626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/13621020120053545

    DO - 10.1080/13621020120053545

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 5

    SP - 103

    EP - 125

    JO - Citizenship Studies

    JF - Citizenship Studies

    SN - 1362-1025

    IS - 2

    ER -