Is it useful to talk to other cancer patients?

A discourse study of lay perceptions of knowledge and expertise in an online support group

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

A growing body of research highlights how patients’ use of the Internet, including constructing, sharing personal stories, and accessing knowledge online, gives rise to a new form of lay expertise, which may further challenge the expertise of medical professionals. Accentuating patients’ perspectives, this paper investigates the variety of positions Chinese cancer patients articulate and adopt regarding knowledge and expertise within an online support group. My analyses demonstrate that, despite being highly proactive and reflexive, these patients actually reproduce and reinforce the dualistic positioning of doctor and patient within broader discourses of scientific knowledge and authoritarian hierarchies, which eventually disempower them. I then provide an explanation of this dualism by underlining the unique reality of China in terms of the co-existence of Western scientific medicine (WSM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and doctor-patient hierarchies. Finally, I outline the implications of this positioning for cancer care and discuss possible solutions drawing on recent humanistic models from the West.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-327
JournalChinese Semiotic Studies
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date15 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

cancer
expertise
discourse
medicine
Group
coexistence
Internet
China
knowledge

Cite this

@article{9c7bfe000026431db0500edb91502280,
title = "Is it useful to talk to other cancer patients?: A discourse study of lay perceptions of knowledge and expertise in an online support group",
abstract = "A growing body of research highlights how patients’ use of the Internet, including constructing, sharing personal stories, and accessing knowledge online, gives rise to a new form of lay expertise, which may further challenge the expertise of medical professionals. Accentuating patients’ perspectives, this paper investigates the variety of positions Chinese cancer patients articulate and adopt regarding knowledge and expertise within an online support group. My analyses demonstrate that, despite being highly proactive and reflexive, these patients actually reproduce and reinforce the dualistic positioning of doctor and patient within broader discourses of scientific knowledge and authoritarian hierarchies, which eventually disempower them. I then provide an explanation of this dualism by underlining the unique reality of China in terms of the co-existence of Western scientific medicine (WSM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and doctor-patient hierarchies. Finally, I outline the implications of this positioning for cancer care and discuss possible solutions drawing on recent humanistic models from the West.",
author = "Feifei ZHOU",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1515/css-2018-0019",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "309--327",
journal = "Chinese Semiotic Studies",
issn = "2198-9605",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "3",

}

Is it useful to talk to other cancer patients? A discourse study of lay perceptions of knowledge and expertise in an online support group. / ZHOU, Feifei.

In: Chinese Semiotic Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, 28.08.2018, p. 309-327.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it useful to talk to other cancer patients?

T2 - A discourse study of lay perceptions of knowledge and expertise in an online support group

AU - ZHOU, Feifei

PY - 2018/8/28

Y1 - 2018/8/28

N2 - A growing body of research highlights how patients’ use of the Internet, including constructing, sharing personal stories, and accessing knowledge online, gives rise to a new form of lay expertise, which may further challenge the expertise of medical professionals. Accentuating patients’ perspectives, this paper investigates the variety of positions Chinese cancer patients articulate and adopt regarding knowledge and expertise within an online support group. My analyses demonstrate that, despite being highly proactive and reflexive, these patients actually reproduce and reinforce the dualistic positioning of doctor and patient within broader discourses of scientific knowledge and authoritarian hierarchies, which eventually disempower them. I then provide an explanation of this dualism by underlining the unique reality of China in terms of the co-existence of Western scientific medicine (WSM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and doctor-patient hierarchies. Finally, I outline the implications of this positioning for cancer care and discuss possible solutions drawing on recent humanistic models from the West.

AB - A growing body of research highlights how patients’ use of the Internet, including constructing, sharing personal stories, and accessing knowledge online, gives rise to a new form of lay expertise, which may further challenge the expertise of medical professionals. Accentuating patients’ perspectives, this paper investigates the variety of positions Chinese cancer patients articulate and adopt regarding knowledge and expertise within an online support group. My analyses demonstrate that, despite being highly proactive and reflexive, these patients actually reproduce and reinforce the dualistic positioning of doctor and patient within broader discourses of scientific knowledge and authoritarian hierarchies, which eventually disempower them. I then provide an explanation of this dualism by underlining the unique reality of China in terms of the co-existence of Western scientific medicine (WSM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and doctor-patient hierarchies. Finally, I outline the implications of this positioning for cancer care and discuss possible solutions drawing on recent humanistic models from the West.

U2 - 10.1515/css-2018-0019

DO - 10.1515/css-2018-0019

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 14

SP - 309

EP - 327

JO - Chinese Semiotic Studies

JF - Chinese Semiotic Studies

SN - 2198-9605

IS - 3

ER -