Jian ai and the Mohist attack of early Confucianism

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

In Chinese pre-Qin period, Mohism was the first school that challenged Confucianism. A common view is that Mohists attacked Confucianism by proposingjian ai, often translated as “universal love,” that opposes Confucian “graded love”. The Confucian-Mohist debate on ethics is often regarded as a debate between Mohist “universal love,” on the one hand; and Confucian emphasis on family and kinship, on the other. However, it is misleading to translate jian aias “universal love,” as it distorts our understanding of the debate. The word jian in classical Chinese means “inclusive,” not “impartial”. The Jian Ai chapters in the Mozi do not object to the idea that our moral practices ought to vary according to our relationship with others and their social positions. Furthermore, Mohist jian ai was not proposed in the first instance to refute Confucian ideas. The Confucian-Mohist debate should not be understood as a battle between nepotism and excessive insistence on impartiality, because both of them advocate that we should care for people in general and that we should maintain close relational ties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-437
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume8
Issue number5
Early online date27 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Attack
Confucian
Confucianism
Universal Love
Kinship
Mozi
Impartiality

Cite this

@article{aec67c19a0d44edeab4030c8bd400d5a,
title = "Jian ai and the Mohist attack of early Confucianism",
abstract = "In Chinese pre-Qin period, Mohism was the first school that challenged Confucianism. A common view is that Mohists attacked Confucianism by proposingjian ai, often translated as “universal love,” that opposes Confucian “graded love”. The Confucian-Mohist debate on ethics is often regarded as a debate between Mohist “universal love,” on the one hand; and Confucian emphasis on family and kinship, on the other. However, it is misleading to translate jian aias “universal love,” as it distorts our understanding of the debate. The word jian in classical Chinese means “inclusive,” not “impartial”. The Jian Ai chapters in the Mozi do not object to the idea that our moral practices ought to vary according to our relationship with others and their social positions. Furthermore, Mohist jian ai was not proposed in the first instance to refute Confucian ideas. The Confucian-Mohist debate should not be understood as a battle between nepotism and excessive insistence on impartiality, because both of them advocate that we should care for people in general and that we should maintain close relational ties.",
author = "CHIU, {Wai Wai}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/phc3.12031",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "425--437",
journal = "Philosophy Compass",
issn = "1747-9991",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Jian ai and the Mohist attack of early Confucianism. / CHIU, Wai Wai.

In: Philosophy Compass, Vol. 8, No. 5, 05.2013, p. 425-437.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jian ai and the Mohist attack of early Confucianism

AU - CHIU, Wai Wai

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - In Chinese pre-Qin period, Mohism was the first school that challenged Confucianism. A common view is that Mohists attacked Confucianism by proposingjian ai, often translated as “universal love,” that opposes Confucian “graded love”. The Confucian-Mohist debate on ethics is often regarded as a debate between Mohist “universal love,” on the one hand; and Confucian emphasis on family and kinship, on the other. However, it is misleading to translate jian aias “universal love,” as it distorts our understanding of the debate. The word jian in classical Chinese means “inclusive,” not “impartial”. The Jian Ai chapters in the Mozi do not object to the idea that our moral practices ought to vary according to our relationship with others and their social positions. Furthermore, Mohist jian ai was not proposed in the first instance to refute Confucian ideas. The Confucian-Mohist debate should not be understood as a battle between nepotism and excessive insistence on impartiality, because both of them advocate that we should care for people in general and that we should maintain close relational ties.

AB - In Chinese pre-Qin period, Mohism was the first school that challenged Confucianism. A common view is that Mohists attacked Confucianism by proposingjian ai, often translated as “universal love,” that opposes Confucian “graded love”. The Confucian-Mohist debate on ethics is often regarded as a debate between Mohist “universal love,” on the one hand; and Confucian emphasis on family and kinship, on the other. However, it is misleading to translate jian aias “universal love,” as it distorts our understanding of the debate. The word jian in classical Chinese means “inclusive,” not “impartial”. The Jian Ai chapters in the Mozi do not object to the idea that our moral practices ought to vary according to our relationship with others and their social positions. Furthermore, Mohist jian ai was not proposed in the first instance to refute Confucian ideas. The Confucian-Mohist debate should not be understood as a battle between nepotism and excessive insistence on impartiality, because both of them advocate that we should care for people in general and that we should maintain close relational ties.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2200

U2 - 10.1111/phc3.12031

DO - 10.1111/phc3.12031

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 8

SP - 425

EP - 437

JO - Philosophy Compass

JF - Philosophy Compass

SN - 1747-9991

IS - 5

ER -