Abstract
This article develops a model of informal procurement within Japanese keiretsu so as to consider effects on intermediate‐good imports, such as auto parts. Parts‐suppliers make relationship‐specific investments that benefit the automaker and prices are determined by bargaining after investment has been sunk. Although this investment raises efficiency, it limits the range of imports to less important parts, such as tailpipes, and it is possible that no parts are imported, despite lower foreign costs. Lack of information concerning investment rents combined with counterintuitive responses of imports to changes in output and costs could create unwarranted perceptions of a trade barrier.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 871-901 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | International Economic Review |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
This article has benefited from presentation at the 1999 ITI Summer Institute, the 1999 SCIIE Conference at Santa Cruz (Nirvikar Singh discussant), the Australian National University, University of Sydney, Kobe University, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, the City University of Hong Kong, and the Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Keiretsu and relationship-specific investment : a barrier to trade?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver