Kuhn versus Popper on science education : a response to Richard Bailey

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review


    In a recent contribution to Learning for Democracy, Richard Bailey argues that Thomas Kuhn advocated an indoctrinatory model of science education, which is fundamentally authority-based. While agreeing with Bailey’s conclusion, this article suggests that Kuhn was attempting to solve an important problem which Bailey only touches on – how to ensure that science students do not become hypercritical. It continues by offering a critical rationalist solution to this problem, arguing that paradigms qua exemplars should be historical problem-solving episodes, rather than model solutions to puzzles.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-52
    Number of pages8
    JournalLearning for Democracy
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2006


    Dive into the research topics of 'Kuhn versus Popper on science education : a response to Richard Bailey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this