TY - JOUR
T1 - Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part II : how to strike the balance
AU - ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - This paper is a supplement to, and provides a proof of principle of, Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level. It illustrates how calculations may be performed in order to determine how the balance between different functions in science—such as imaginative, critical, and dogmatic—should be struck, with respect to confirmation (or corroboration) functions and rules of scientific method.
AB - This paper is a supplement to, and provides a proof of principle of, Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level. It illustrates how calculations may be performed in order to determine how the balance between different functions in science—such as imaginative, critical, and dogmatic—should be struck, with respect to confirmation (or corroboration) functions and rules of scientific method.
UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/711
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874525565&doi=10.1016%2fj.shpsa.2012.11.011&partnerID=40&md5=8812a669afae81fb59f40382773675b5
U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.11.011
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
SN - 0039-3681
VL - 44
SP - 161
EP - 168
JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
IS - 2
ER -