TY - JOUR
T1 - Land use regression modelling of air pollution in high density high rise cities : a case study in Hong Kong
AU - LEE, Martha
AU - BRAUER, Michael
AU - WONG, Pui Yun, Paulina
AU - TANG, Robert
AU - TSUI, Tsz Him
AU - CHOI, Crystal
AU - CHENG, Wei
AU - LAI, Poh Chin
AU - TIAN, Linwei
AU - THACH, Thuan Quoc
AU - ALLEN, Ryan
AU - BARRATT, Benjamin
N1 - Corrigendum to this article was published in December 2017, Science of The Total Environment, 603/604, 832-833. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.225
PY - 2017/8/15
Y1 - 2017/8/15
N2 - Land use regression (LUR) is a common method of predicting spatial variability of air pollution to estimate exposure. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and black carbon (BC) concentrations were measured during two sampling campaigns (April–May and November–January) in Hong Kong (a prototypical high-density high-rise city). Along with 365 potential geospatial predictor variables, these concentrations were used to build two-dimensional land use regression (LUR) models for the territory. Summary statistics for combined measurements over both campaigns were: a) NO2( Mean = 106 μg/m3, SD = 38.5, N = 95), b) NO ( M = 147 μg/m3, SD = 88.9, N = 40), c) PM2.5 ( M = 35 μg/m3, SD = 6.3, N = 64), and BC ( M = 10.6 μg/m3, SD = 5.3, N = 76). Final LUR models had the following statistics: a) NO2 (R2 = 0.46, RMSE = 28 μg/m3) b) NO (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 62 μg/m3), c) PM2.5 (R2 = 0.59; RMSE = 4 μg/m3), and d) BC (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 4 μg/m3). Traditional LUR predictors such as road length, car park density, and land use types were included in most models. The NO2 prediction surface values were highest in Kowloon and the northern region of Hong Kong Island (downtown Hong Kong). NO showed a similar pattern in the built-up region. Both PM2.5 and BC predictions exhibited a northwest-southeast gradient, with higher concentrations in the north (close to mainland China). For BC, the port was also an area of elevated predicted concentrations. The results matched with existing literature on spatial variation in concentrations of air pollutants and in relation to important emission sources in Hong Kong. The success of these models suggests LUR is appropriate in high-density, high-rise cities.
AB - Land use regression (LUR) is a common method of predicting spatial variability of air pollution to estimate exposure. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and black carbon (BC) concentrations were measured during two sampling campaigns (April–May and November–January) in Hong Kong (a prototypical high-density high-rise city). Along with 365 potential geospatial predictor variables, these concentrations were used to build two-dimensional land use regression (LUR) models for the territory. Summary statistics for combined measurements over both campaigns were: a) NO2( Mean = 106 μg/m3, SD = 38.5, N = 95), b) NO ( M = 147 μg/m3, SD = 88.9, N = 40), c) PM2.5 ( M = 35 μg/m3, SD = 6.3, N = 64), and BC ( M = 10.6 μg/m3, SD = 5.3, N = 76). Final LUR models had the following statistics: a) NO2 (R2 = 0.46, RMSE = 28 μg/m3) b) NO (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 62 μg/m3), c) PM2.5 (R2 = 0.59; RMSE = 4 μg/m3), and d) BC (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 4 μg/m3). Traditional LUR predictors such as road length, car park density, and land use types were included in most models. The NO2 prediction surface values were highest in Kowloon and the northern region of Hong Kong Island (downtown Hong Kong). NO showed a similar pattern in the built-up region. Both PM2.5 and BC predictions exhibited a northwest-southeast gradient, with higher concentrations in the north (close to mainland China). For BC, the port was also an area of elevated predicted concentrations. The results matched with existing literature on spatial variation in concentrations of air pollutants and in relation to important emission sources in Hong Kong. The success of these models suggests LUR is appropriate in high-density, high-rise cities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015383059&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.094
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.094
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
C2 - 28319717
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 592
SP - 306
EP - 315
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
ER -