“Late dividends of the British Empire”: Language ideologies and the native/non-native question in online newspaper comments

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

As the use of English as a lingua franca increases in a range of contexts, one question that has received recent media attention is that of whether native or non-native speakers are more effective communicators in these contexts. The native/non-native question resists a straightforward answer, but taking account of the views of people in the business world is a necessary step towards understanding the underlying issues. This article investigates the nature and origin of these views by analysing online newspaper comments written in response to a column in the Financial Times. It first identifies several topics related to the native/non-native question, including perceived differences between and within the two categories. It then discusses these topics from a language-ideological perspective, aiming to identify the patterns of beliefs and assumptions that inform the comments. Although this perspective involves a critical evaluation of the binary “native/non-native” opposition, the article identifies several important effects of the native speaker concept, ranging from outright discrimination to feelings of frustration and inhibition. It portrays the comments as both reflecting and questioning the ideological premises of the native speaker concept, and it considers the implications of the approach for ELF research and for the wider study of international communication.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-153
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of English as a Lingua Franca
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Ideologies
newspaper
international communication
communicator
Communication
frustration
language
Industry
opposition
discrimination
evaluation
British Empire
Language Ideology
Native Speaker
time
English as a Lingua Franca
Language
Communicators
Non-native Speakers
Evaluation

Keywords

  • language ideologies
  • media discourse
  • native and non-native speakers
  • business communication

Cite this

@article{e3158e84522f457994ca6c9d5b17ac8d,
title = "“Late dividends of the British Empire”: Language ideologies and the native/non-native question in online newspaper comments",
abstract = "As the use of English as a lingua franca increases in a range of contexts, one question that has received recent media attention is that of whether native or non-native speakers are more effective communicators in these contexts. The native/non-native question resists a straightforward answer, but taking account of the views of people in the business world is a necessary step towards understanding the underlying issues. This article investigates the nature and origin of these views by analysing online newspaper comments written in response to a column in the Financial Times. It first identifies several topics related to the native/non-native question, including perceived differences between and within the two categories. It then discusses these topics from a language-ideological perspective, aiming to identify the patterns of beliefs and assumptions that inform the comments. Although this perspective involves a critical evaluation of the binary “native/non-native” opposition, the article identifies several important effects of the native speaker concept, ranging from outright discrimination to feelings of frustration and inhibition. It portrays the comments as both reflecting and questioning the ideological premises of the native speaker concept, and it considers the implications of the approach for ELF research and for the wider study of international communication.",
keywords = "language ideologies, media discourse, native and non-native speakers, business communication",
author = "Andrew SEWELL",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/jelf-2019-2002",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "125--153",
journal = "Journal of English as a Lingua Franca",
issn = "2191-9216",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Late dividends of the British Empire”: Language ideologies and the native/non-native question in online newspaper comments

AU - SEWELL, Andrew

PY - 2019/6/26

Y1 - 2019/6/26

N2 - As the use of English as a lingua franca increases in a range of contexts, one question that has received recent media attention is that of whether native or non-native speakers are more effective communicators in these contexts. The native/non-native question resists a straightforward answer, but taking account of the views of people in the business world is a necessary step towards understanding the underlying issues. This article investigates the nature and origin of these views by analysing online newspaper comments written in response to a column in the Financial Times. It first identifies several topics related to the native/non-native question, including perceived differences between and within the two categories. It then discusses these topics from a language-ideological perspective, aiming to identify the patterns of beliefs and assumptions that inform the comments. Although this perspective involves a critical evaluation of the binary “native/non-native” opposition, the article identifies several important effects of the native speaker concept, ranging from outright discrimination to feelings of frustration and inhibition. It portrays the comments as both reflecting and questioning the ideological premises of the native speaker concept, and it considers the implications of the approach for ELF research and for the wider study of international communication.

AB - As the use of English as a lingua franca increases in a range of contexts, one question that has received recent media attention is that of whether native or non-native speakers are more effective communicators in these contexts. The native/non-native question resists a straightforward answer, but taking account of the views of people in the business world is a necessary step towards understanding the underlying issues. This article investigates the nature and origin of these views by analysing online newspaper comments written in response to a column in the Financial Times. It first identifies several topics related to the native/non-native question, including perceived differences between and within the two categories. It then discusses these topics from a language-ideological perspective, aiming to identify the patterns of beliefs and assumptions that inform the comments. Although this perspective involves a critical evaluation of the binary “native/non-native” opposition, the article identifies several important effects of the native speaker concept, ranging from outright discrimination to feelings of frustration and inhibition. It portrays the comments as both reflecting and questioning the ideological premises of the native speaker concept, and it considers the implications of the approach for ELF research and for the wider study of international communication.

KW - language ideologies

KW - media discourse

KW - native and non-native speakers

KW - business communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067408264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/jelf-2019-2002

DO - 10.1515/jelf-2019-2002

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 8

SP - 125

EP - 153

JO - Journal of English as a Lingua Franca

JF - Journal of English as a Lingua Franca

SN - 2191-9216

IS - 1

ER -