Abstract
Economic sociologists have argued that financial markets should be analysed as uncertainty-processing social networks and intermediary groups. Networks and intermediaries alone cannot confer legitimacy upon financial actors and transactions. Status groups are a solution to this problem. They emphasize reputation, honour and good social behaviour as stabilizers of collective action, as means of social control and as indicators of legitimacy. I examine here the emergence and evolution of status groups of brokers in London, New York and Paris, and show how emphasis on honour was used to legitimize financial transactions. I argue that financial markets should be conceived as networks, intermediary and status groups. In global, automated financial markets status groups like securities analysts are gaining in prominence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 451-471 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | British Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 9 Sept 2005 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Brokers
- Global financial markets
- Honour
- Legitimacy
- Status groups
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimacy and status groups in financial markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver