LIBOR Discontinuation and the Cost of Bank Loans

Jeong Bon KIM, Chong WANG*, Feng Harry WU

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

With the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) being replaced by risk-free rate (RFR)-based alternative reference rates, the fundamental differences between the two benchmarking frameworks impose significant risks on banks. Exploiting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)’s announcement of the phase-out of LIBOR, we conduct a difference-in-differences analysis based on banks’ reliance on LIBOR and show that LIBOR discontinuation entails higher interest rate spread of bank loans. The result implies that banks tend to compensate for the LIBOR-to-RFR risks by passing on the transition costs to borrowers. This effect is attenuated if multiple benchmarks are already in use, for relationship lending, and among banks operating in a competitive environment. We further find that LIBOR discontinuation leads to more collateral and covenant requirements in loan terms. After the FCA announcement, banks are inclined to switch away from LIBOR dependence by referencing alternative rates.
Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement Science
Early online date12 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • LIBOR discontinuation
  • cost of bank loans
  • alternative reference rates
  • loan contracting

Cite this