Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook Chapter

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

In Western political thought Caesarism, whether associated with, or subsumed under, its various cognate concepts such as tyranny, dictatorship, and Bonapartism, has had a durable and contradictory history. From the perspective of the history of ideas, the emergence and development of the bundle of ideas described by the term Caesarism is more than an intellectual attempt to formulate categories capable of capturing and characterizing it as a political and historical phenomenon. Theories of dictatorship and tyranny are also ideological constructions with normative and moral content, and thus political. It is only since the French Revolution and its aftermath, however, that Caesarism and its various interpretations have assumed both political and intellectual importance. It is the emergence of modern forms of politics, and the undermining of traditional norms and institutions, that has fueled debates over the nature and role of Caesarism. Thus, in the nineteenth century, ideological and theoretical battles reflected and expressed political alignments and social conflicts among liberals and conservatives (in the classical European sense), monarchists and Bonapartists, classical Marxists and republicans. In the twentieth century, the political struggle among liberal democrats, socialists, communists, and Fascists was expressed in part by ideological polemics over the nature and meaning of such terms as totalitarian dictatorship and totalitarian democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism
EditorsPeter BAEHR, Melvin RICHTER
PublisherGerman Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press
Pages155-174
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781139052429
ISBN (Print)9780521825634, 9780521532709
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2004

Fingerprint

Max Weber
Avatar
Dictatorship
Totalitarian
Tyranny
Democracy
History
Social Conflict
Communist
Cognates
Bundle
French Revolution
Alignment
Liberal Democrats
History of Ideas
Contradictory
Socialist
Republican
Political Thought

Cite this

BAEHR, W. P. (2004). Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism. In P. BAEHR, & M. RICHTER (Eds.), Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism (pp. 155-174). German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008
BAEHR, William Peter. / Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism. Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism. editor / Peter BAEHR ; Melvin RICHTER. German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 155-174
@inbook{b61ebe99b28d4430a398a9f364835a8c,
title = "Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism",
abstract = "In Western political thought Caesarism, whether associated with, or subsumed under, its various cognate concepts such as tyranny, dictatorship, and Bonapartism, has had a durable and contradictory history. From the perspective of the history of ideas, the emergence and development of the bundle of ideas described by the term Caesarism is more than an intellectual attempt to formulate categories capable of capturing and characterizing it as a political and historical phenomenon. Theories of dictatorship and tyranny are also ideological constructions with normative and moral content, and thus political. It is only since the French Revolution and its aftermath, however, that Caesarism and its various interpretations have assumed both political and intellectual importance. It is the emergence of modern forms of politics, and the undermining of traditional norms and institutions, that has fueled debates over the nature and role of Caesarism. Thus, in the nineteenth century, ideological and theoretical battles reflected and expressed political alignments and social conflicts among liberals and conservatives (in the classical European sense), monarchists and Bonapartists, classical Marxists and republicans. In the twentieth century, the political struggle among liberal democrats, socialists, communists, and Fascists was expressed in part by ideological polemics over the nature and meaning of such terms as totalitarian dictatorship and totalitarian democracy.",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521825634",
pages = "155--174",
editor = "Peter BAEHR and Melvin RICHTER",
booktitle = "Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism",
publisher = "German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press",

}

BAEHR, WP 2004, Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism. in P BAEHR & M RICHTER (eds), Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism. German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008

Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism. / BAEHR, William Peter.

Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism. ed. / Peter BAEHR; Melvin RICHTER. German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 155-174.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - In Western political thought Caesarism, whether associated with, or subsumed under, its various cognate concepts such as tyranny, dictatorship, and Bonapartism, has had a durable and contradictory history. From the perspective of the history of ideas, the emergence and development of the bundle of ideas described by the term Caesarism is more than an intellectual attempt to formulate categories capable of capturing and characterizing it as a political and historical phenomenon. Theories of dictatorship and tyranny are also ideological constructions with normative and moral content, and thus political. It is only since the French Revolution and its aftermath, however, that Caesarism and its various interpretations have assumed both political and intellectual importance. It is the emergence of modern forms of politics, and the undermining of traditional norms and institutions, that has fueled debates over the nature and role of Caesarism. Thus, in the nineteenth century, ideological and theoretical battles reflected and expressed political alignments and social conflicts among liberals and conservatives (in the classical European sense), monarchists and Bonapartists, classical Marxists and republicans. In the twentieth century, the political struggle among liberal democrats, socialists, communists, and Fascists was expressed in part by ideological polemics over the nature and meaning of such terms as totalitarian dictatorship and totalitarian democracy.

AB - In Western political thought Caesarism, whether associated with, or subsumed under, its various cognate concepts such as tyranny, dictatorship, and Bonapartism, has had a durable and contradictory history. From the perspective of the history of ideas, the emergence and development of the bundle of ideas described by the term Caesarism is more than an intellectual attempt to formulate categories capable of capturing and characterizing it as a political and historical phenomenon. Theories of dictatorship and tyranny are also ideological constructions with normative and moral content, and thus political. It is only since the French Revolution and its aftermath, however, that Caesarism and its various interpretations have assumed both political and intellectual importance. It is the emergence of modern forms of politics, and the undermining of traditional norms and institutions, that has fueled debates over the nature and role of Caesarism. Thus, in the nineteenth century, ideological and theoretical battles reflected and expressed political alignments and social conflicts among liberals and conservatives (in the classical European sense), monarchists and Bonapartists, classical Marxists and republicans. In the twentieth century, the political struggle among liberal democrats, socialists, communists, and Fascists was expressed in part by ideological polemics over the nature and meaning of such terms as totalitarian dictatorship and totalitarian democracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960985186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3929

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780521825634

SN - 9780521532709

SP - 155

EP - 174

BT - Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism

A2 - BAEHR, Peter

A2 - RICHTER, Melvin

PB - German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press

ER -

BAEHR WP. Max Weber and the avatars of Caesarism. In BAEHR P, RICHTER M, editors, Dictatorship in history and theory : Bonapartism, Caesarism, and totalitarianism. German Historical Institute and Cambridge University Press. 2004. p. 155-174 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139052429.008