Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Meaningful matches in stereovision

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

This paper introduces a statistical method to decide whether two blocks in a pair of images match reliably. The method ensures that the selected block matches are unlikely to have occurred just by chance. The new approach is based on the definition of a simple but faithful statistical background model for image blocks learned from the image itself. A theorem guarantees that under this model, not more than a fixed number of wrong matches occurs (on average) for the whole image. This fixed number (the number of false alarms) is the only method parameter. Furthermore, the number of false alarms associated with each match measures its reliability. This a contrario block-matching method, however, cannot rule out false matches due to the presence of periodic objects in the images. But it is successfully complemented by a parameterless self-similarity threshold. Experimental evidence shows that the proposed method also detects occlusions and incoherent motions due to vehicles and pedestrians in nonsimultaneous stereo. © 2012 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6042882
Pages (from-to)930-942
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Volume34
Issue number5
Early online date13 Oct 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Funding

The authors thank Pascal Getreuer for helpful comments on this work. This work was partially supported by the following projects: FREEDOM (ANR07-JCJC-0048-01), Callisto (ANR-09-CORD-003), ECOS Sud U06E01, and STIC Amsud (11STIC-01 - MMVPSCV). Neus Sabater was with ENS Cachan, CMLA, France, when the paper was written.

Keywords

  • a contrario detection
  • block matching
  • number of false alarms (NFA)
  • Stereo vision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meaningful matches in stereovision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this