Mental machines

David L. BARACK*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscientists are turning to an increasingly rich array of neurodynamical systems to explain mental phenomena. In these explanations, cognitive capacities are decomposed into a set of functions, each of which is described mathematically, and then these descriptions are mapped on to corresponding mathematical descriptions of the dynamics of neural systems. In this paper, I outline a novel explanatory schema based on these explanations. I then argue that these explanations present a novel type of dynamicism for the philosophy of mind and neuroscience, componential dynamicism, that focuses on the parts of cognitive systems that fill certain functional roles in producing cognitive phenomena.
Original languageEnglish
Article number63
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume34
Issue number6
Early online date25 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This work has benefitted greatly from a number of comments over many years. The work draws on my dissertation at Duke University, and I would like to thank Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Alex Rosenberg, Karen Neander, Felipe De Brigard, and Michael Platt for their thoughtful input. I would also like to thank Gaultiero Piccinini, Chris Peacocke, William Lycan, Ann-Sophie Barwich, Jorge Morales, Nemira Gasiunas, Michael Weisberg, and the University of Pennsylvania philosophy of science reading group for critical comments.

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Dynamical systems
  • Explanation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mental machines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this