Metaphor and culture

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

The first part of this paper revisits Qian Zhongshu’s theory of vehicular diversity and multivalency in an attempt to question the plausibility and necessity of postulating conceptual metaphors that have dominated so much of our contemporary discussions of metaphor. Using examples from both Chinese and English, it tries to show that conceptual metaphors are nothing more than linguists’ meta-metaphorical constructs whose number could proliferate towards infinity due to the polysemic nature of figurative expressions. It also argues that lower-level semantic associations between the vehicle and the tenor are sufficient for explaining the existence or the emergence of a metaphor. The second part of this paper goes on to demonstrate the inseparable relationship between metaphor and culture and, by analyzing the Chinese folk custom of well-wishing and Chinese scholars’ penchant for certain kinds of plants in decorating their homes and offices, to reveal two predominant metaphorical patterns that lie behind what seems to be a kaleidoscope of symbols.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-69
Number of pages23
JournalAsian Social Science
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Conceptual Metaphor
Kaleidoscope
Tenor
Symbol
Infinity
Plausibility
Penchant
Figurative
Folk

Keywords

  • Chinese symbolism
  • Qian Zhongshu
  • Theory of metaphor
  • Umberto Eco

Cite this

DING, Ersu. / Metaphor and culture. In: Asian Social Science. 2009 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 47-69.
@article{c5a25d078e31460da3611cc2729efbd2,
title = "Metaphor and culture",
abstract = "The first part of this paper revisits Qian Zhongshu’s theory of vehicular diversity and multivalency in an attempt to question the plausibility and necessity of postulating conceptual metaphors that have dominated so much of our contemporary discussions of metaphor. Using examples from both Chinese and English, it tries to show that conceptual metaphors are nothing more than linguists’ meta-metaphorical constructs whose number could proliferate towards infinity due to the polysemic nature of figurative expressions. It also argues that lower-level semantic associations between the vehicle and the tenor are sufficient for explaining the existence or the emergence of a metaphor. The second part of this paper goes on to demonstrate the inseparable relationship between metaphor and culture and, by analyzing the Chinese folk custom of well-wishing and Chinese scholars’ penchant for certain kinds of plants in decorating their homes and offices, to reveal two predominant metaphorical patterns that lie behind what seems to be a kaleidoscope of symbols.",
keywords = "Chinese symbolism, Qian Zhongshu, Theory of metaphor, Umberto Eco",
author = "Ersu DING",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5539/ass.v5n1p47",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "47--69",
journal = "Asian Social Science",
issn = "1911-2017",
publisher = "Canadian Center of Science and Education",
number = "1",

}

Metaphor and culture. / DING, Ersu.

In: Asian Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 47-69.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metaphor and culture

AU - DING, Ersu

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The first part of this paper revisits Qian Zhongshu’s theory of vehicular diversity and multivalency in an attempt to question the plausibility and necessity of postulating conceptual metaphors that have dominated so much of our contemporary discussions of metaphor. Using examples from both Chinese and English, it tries to show that conceptual metaphors are nothing more than linguists’ meta-metaphorical constructs whose number could proliferate towards infinity due to the polysemic nature of figurative expressions. It also argues that lower-level semantic associations between the vehicle and the tenor are sufficient for explaining the existence or the emergence of a metaphor. The second part of this paper goes on to demonstrate the inseparable relationship between metaphor and culture and, by analyzing the Chinese folk custom of well-wishing and Chinese scholars’ penchant for certain kinds of plants in decorating their homes and offices, to reveal two predominant metaphorical patterns that lie behind what seems to be a kaleidoscope of symbols.

AB - The first part of this paper revisits Qian Zhongshu’s theory of vehicular diversity and multivalency in an attempt to question the plausibility and necessity of postulating conceptual metaphors that have dominated so much of our contemporary discussions of metaphor. Using examples from both Chinese and English, it tries to show that conceptual metaphors are nothing more than linguists’ meta-metaphorical constructs whose number could proliferate towards infinity due to the polysemic nature of figurative expressions. It also argues that lower-level semantic associations between the vehicle and the tenor are sufficient for explaining the existence or the emergence of a metaphor. The second part of this paper goes on to demonstrate the inseparable relationship between metaphor and culture and, by analyzing the Chinese folk custom of well-wishing and Chinese scholars’ penchant for certain kinds of plants in decorating their homes and offices, to reveal two predominant metaphorical patterns that lie behind what seems to be a kaleidoscope of symbols.

KW - Chinese symbolism

KW - Qian Zhongshu

KW - Theory of metaphor

KW - Umberto Eco

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1901

U2 - 10.5539/ass.v5n1p47

DO - 10.5539/ass.v5n1p47

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 5

SP - 47

EP - 69

JO - Asian Social Science

JF - Asian Social Science

SN - 1911-2017

IS - 1

ER -