Mill, the Freedom from Sanction, and the Freedom to Sanction

Derek Clayton BAKER

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsConference Paper (other)Other Conference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

Mill's position on freedom of expression is attractive when understood as a position on freedom from legal restrictions on speech. However, Mill claims that it is more: it is a principle limiting justifiable social restrictions on speech, as well. Unfortunately, Mill's position on freedom of expression is counterintuitive once we include freedom from informal social sanctions. More importantly, the Harm Principle cannot be used as the norm for governing when moral censure of speech is and is not appropriate. Moral censure itself is a form of speech, and so requiring that we limit its use according to the Harm Principle will result in inconsistent verdicts about whether certain instances of expression are permissible.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 12 Oct 2018
EventInternational Workshop on Punishment and J.S. Mill : Themes from the Work of C.L. Ten - Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Duration: 12 Oct 201813 Oct 2018
http://www.phil.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/web/event/international-workshop-on-punishment-and-j-s-mill-themes-from-c-l-ten/

Workshop

WorkshopInternational Workshop on Punishment and J.S. Mill : Themes from the Work of C.L. Ten
Country/TerritoryHong Kong
CityHong Kong
Period12/10/1813/10/18
OtherOrganised by Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Supporting organization: CUHK Centre for Bioethics
Internet address

Bibliographical note

Invited paper.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mill, the Freedom from Sanction, and the Freedom to Sanction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this