Abstract
In this article, we present an account of ming 明 in the Zhuangzi's Neipian in light of the disagreements among the thinkers of the time. We suggest that ming is associated with the Daoist sage's vision: he sees through the debaters' attempts to win the debates. We propose that ming is primarily a meta-epistemological stance, that is, the sage understands the nature of the debates and does not enter the fray; therefore he does not share the thinkers' anxieties. The sage takes his stance at the pivot of dao (daoshu 道樞) and, from there, responds to the different views limitlessly.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 527-543 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Chinese Philosophy |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2013 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014 Journal of Chinese Philosophy
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.