Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students : effects of others' expertise and one's own confidence on engaging in conflict

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers (A. C. Amason, 1996; D. H. Gruenfeld, 1995; K. A. Jehn, 1995, 1997; M. A. Rahim, 1989; M. A. Rahim and A. A. Blum, 1994; D. M. Schweiger, W. R. Sandberg, and P. L. Rechner, 1989; P. E. Tetlock, D. Armor, and R. S. Peterson, 1994) have documented the value of conflictual discussions for solving problems, but few have explored the conditions under which people are motivated to engage in controversy (K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick, and S. M. B. Thatcher, 1997). Some (M. Van Berklom and D. Tjosvold, 1981) have hypothesized that high expertise and a competitive social context arouse concerns about defending one's position and challenging the opposing one. In the present study, Chinese university students in Hong Kong who expected to disagree with an expert, compared with those who did not expect to disagree with an expert, had less confidence, felt less knowledgeable about their position, and selected an agreeable discussant. Consistent with the idea of maintaining distance from those in power, the participants were reluctant to disagree directly with someone with greater expertise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-363
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume141
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2001

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
Motivation
Research Personnel
Students
Conflict (Psychology)
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Chinese university students
  • Confidence
  • Conflict
  • Controversy
  • Disagreement
  • Expertise

Cite this

@article{51f4a56115b84047aad9bc3a2f628150,
title = "Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students : effects of others' expertise and one's own confidence on engaging in conflict",
abstract = "Researchers (A. C. Amason, 1996; D. H. Gruenfeld, 1995; K. A. Jehn, 1995, 1997; M. A. Rahim, 1989; M. A. Rahim and A. A. Blum, 1994; D. M. Schweiger, W. R. Sandberg, and P. L. Rechner, 1989; P. E. Tetlock, D. Armor, and R. S. Peterson, 1994) have documented the value of conflictual discussions for solving problems, but few have explored the conditions under which people are motivated to engage in controversy (K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick, and S. M. B. Thatcher, 1997). Some (M. Van Berklom and D. Tjosvold, 1981) have hypothesized that high expertise and a competitive social context arouse concerns about defending one's position and challenging the opposing one. In the present study, Chinese university students in Hong Kong who expected to disagree with an expert, compared with those who did not expect to disagree with an expert, had less confidence, felt less knowledgeable about their position, and selected an agreeable discussant. Consistent with the idea of maintaining distance from those in power, the participants were reluctant to disagree directly with someone with greater expertise.",
keywords = "Chinese university students, Confidence, Conflict, Controversy, Disagreement, Expertise",
author = "TJOSVOLD, {Dean William} and Roger NIBLER and WAN, {Man Kei, Paulina}",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224540109600557",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "353--363",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students : effects of others' expertise and one's own confidence on engaging in conflict. / TJOSVOLD, Dean William; NIBLER, Roger; WAN, Man Kei, Paulina.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 141, No. 3, 01.06.2001, p. 353-363.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students : effects of others' expertise and one's own confidence on engaging in conflict

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean William

AU - NIBLER, Roger

AU - WAN, Man Kei, Paulina

PY - 2001/6/1

Y1 - 2001/6/1

N2 - Researchers (A. C. Amason, 1996; D. H. Gruenfeld, 1995; K. A. Jehn, 1995, 1997; M. A. Rahim, 1989; M. A. Rahim and A. A. Blum, 1994; D. M. Schweiger, W. R. Sandberg, and P. L. Rechner, 1989; P. E. Tetlock, D. Armor, and R. S. Peterson, 1994) have documented the value of conflictual discussions for solving problems, but few have explored the conditions under which people are motivated to engage in controversy (K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick, and S. M. B. Thatcher, 1997). Some (M. Van Berklom and D. Tjosvold, 1981) have hypothesized that high expertise and a competitive social context arouse concerns about defending one's position and challenging the opposing one. In the present study, Chinese university students in Hong Kong who expected to disagree with an expert, compared with those who did not expect to disagree with an expert, had less confidence, felt less knowledgeable about their position, and selected an agreeable discussant. Consistent with the idea of maintaining distance from those in power, the participants were reluctant to disagree directly with someone with greater expertise.

AB - Researchers (A. C. Amason, 1996; D. H. Gruenfeld, 1995; K. A. Jehn, 1995, 1997; M. A. Rahim, 1989; M. A. Rahim and A. A. Blum, 1994; D. M. Schweiger, W. R. Sandberg, and P. L. Rechner, 1989; P. E. Tetlock, D. Armor, and R. S. Peterson, 1994) have documented the value of conflictual discussions for solving problems, but few have explored the conditions under which people are motivated to engage in controversy (K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick, and S. M. B. Thatcher, 1997). Some (M. Van Berklom and D. Tjosvold, 1981) have hypothesized that high expertise and a competitive social context arouse concerns about defending one's position and challenging the opposing one. In the present study, Chinese university students in Hong Kong who expected to disagree with an expert, compared with those who did not expect to disagree with an expert, had less confidence, felt less knowledgeable about their position, and selected an agreeable discussant. Consistent with the idea of maintaining distance from those in power, the participants were reluctant to disagree directly with someone with greater expertise.

KW - Chinese university students

KW - Confidence

KW - Conflict

KW - Controversy

KW - Disagreement

KW - Expertise

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2337

U2 - 10.1080/00224540109600557

DO - 10.1080/00224540109600557

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 141

SP - 353

EP - 363

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 3

ER -