Abstract
Although the search of proper adsorbents for efficient propane/propene (PA/PE) separation has attracted great interest, the actual process-level performance of adsorbents has been rarely considered as a filtering criterion. In this work, a multi-level computational screening of a database containing 936 anion-pillared metal–organic frameworks (AP MOF) is performed to identify promising adsorbents for practical PA/PE separation in pressure/vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) processes. At the crystal level, the geometry properties are computed. The adsorption isotherms at the phase level are predicted via molecular simulations with the newly calibrated force field parameters. Based on the results from these two levels, 216 candidates are discarded. Then, referring to a rigorous 4-step PVSA model, a simplified batch adsorber model is proposed and used to efficiently identify qualified AP MOF candidates that can meet the separation requirements on PE purity (≥99.5 %) and a certain recovery. The screening indicates that 15 AP MOFs can be used to separate 15 %/85 % PA/PE feed gas with 80 % PE recovery. Only 2 out of them are feasible for the separation of 50 %/50 % feed with 75 % PE recovery. Finally, one of the best candidates is sent for rigorous PVSA process optimization. It shows that the screened adsorbent consumes less energy in the separation of 15 %/85 % PA/PE mixture compared with the benchmark 4A zeolite process. Clearly, this work is anticipated to provide an effective approach for the rapid screening of adsorbents for PA/PE separation in PVSA processes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 123378 |
Journal | Gas Separation and Purification |
Volume | 312 |
Early online date | 7 Feb 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
This work was supported in part by the Project of Hetao Shenzhen-Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Zone (HZQB-KCZYB-2020083). The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the financial support from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No. 21DZ1206200). The Supporting Information is available free of charge at. Comparison of experimental isotherms and GCMC predictions from UFF and TraPPE-UA; Calibrated LJ parameters; Equations and boundary conditions for PVSA process; Input parameters for PVSA process model; PLD, porosity, density, and theoretical propene saturation loading of 926 AP MOFs; Predicted adsorption loadings, heat of adsorption, and fitted DSL parameters for 772 AP MOFs; Feasible AP MOFs for PA/PE separation; Parameters for three AP MOF benchmarksKeywords
- Anion-pillared MOF
- Molecular simulation
- Multi-objective PVSA optimization
- Process-driven screening
- Propane/propene separation