N-rays and the semantic view of scientific progress

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper challenges a recent argument of Bird’s, which involves imagining that Réné Blondlot’s belief in N-rays was true, in favour of the view that scientific progress should be understood in terms of knowledge rather than truth. By considering several variants of Bird’s thought-experiment, it shows that the semantic account of progress cannot be so easily vanquished. A key possibility is that justification is only instrumental in, and not partly constitutive of, progress.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-278
Number of pages2
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Scientific Progress
Birds
Ray
Justification
Imagining
Thought Experiments

Keywords

  • Alexander Bird
  • Goal of inquiry
  • Scientific progress
  • Value problem

Cite this

@article{c2ebb7a98b42412cb3acd9f454bcbf87,
title = "N-rays and the semantic view of scientific progress",
abstract = "This paper challenges a recent argument of Bird’s, which involves imagining that R{\'e}n{\'e} Blondlot’s belief in N-rays was true, in favour of the view that scientific progress should be understood in terms of knowledge rather than truth. By considering several variants of Bird’s thought-experiment, it shows that the semantic account of progress cannot be so easily vanquished. A key possibility is that justification is only instrumental in, and not partly constitutive of, progress.",
keywords = "Alexander Bird, Goal of inquiry, Scientific progress, Value problem",
author = "ROWBOTTOM, {Darrell Patrick}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "277--278",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

N-rays and the semantic view of scientific progress. / ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick.

In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 277-278.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - N-rays and the semantic view of scientific progress

AU - ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - This paper challenges a recent argument of Bird’s, which involves imagining that Réné Blondlot’s belief in N-rays was true, in favour of the view that scientific progress should be understood in terms of knowledge rather than truth. By considering several variants of Bird’s thought-experiment, it shows that the semantic account of progress cannot be so easily vanquished. A key possibility is that justification is only instrumental in, and not partly constitutive of, progress.

AB - This paper challenges a recent argument of Bird’s, which involves imagining that Réné Blondlot’s belief in N-rays was true, in favour of the view that scientific progress should be understood in terms of knowledge rather than truth. By considering several variants of Bird’s thought-experiment, it shows that the semantic account of progress cannot be so easily vanquished. A key possibility is that justification is only instrumental in, and not partly constitutive of, progress.

KW - Alexander Bird

KW - Goal of inquiry

KW - Scientific progress

KW - Value problem

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2705

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.010

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 39

SP - 277

EP - 278

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

SN - 0039-3681

IS - 2

ER -