Neither repression nor concession? A regime's attrition against mass protests

Wai Hei, Samson YUEN*, Wai, Edmund CHENG

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protest activists employ various strategies to challenge regimes, and regimes deploy multifaceted tactics to respond to such challenges. Existing studies on regime protest responses focus on repression and concession, but little attention is devoted to toleration, which is often regarded as government inaction. Drawing on primary sources and interviews, this article analyses regime responses to Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement to expand the conceptualisation of toleration. First, it demonstrates that regimes adapt multiple strategies to protesters’ reactions rather than adhering to a single response. Second, it shows that toleration, other than ignoring protests, entails proactive tactics that we summarise as attrition. While ‘tolerating’ street occupation, the regime sought to eliminate political opportunities by maintaining elite cohesion, increase participation costs by mobilising countermovements and bolster legitimacy by leveraging the court as a revered institution. This new conceptual distinction thus captures regime innovation in counteracting protests and broadens the typology of regime responses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-630
Number of pages20
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

concession
repression
protest
regime
tactics
group cohesion
typology
legitimacy
occupation
elite
innovation
participation
costs
interview

Keywords

  • contentious politics
  • regime response
  • occupy
  • Umbrella Movement
  • Hong Kong

Cite this

@article{d4b4442c7c6a4f2eb01991e955a5d284,
title = "Neither repression nor concession? A regime's attrition against mass protests",
abstract = "Protest activists employ various strategies to challenge regimes, and regimes deploy multifaceted tactics to respond to such challenges. Existing studies on regime protest responses focus on repression and concession, but little attention is devoted to toleration, which is often regarded as government inaction. Drawing on primary sources and interviews, this article analyses regime responses to Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement to expand the conceptualisation of toleration. First, it demonstrates that regimes adapt multiple strategies to protesters’ reactions rather than adhering to a single response. Second, it shows that toleration, other than ignoring protests, entails proactive tactics that we summarise as attrition. While ‘tolerating’ street occupation, the regime sought to eliminate political opportunities by maintaining elite cohesion, increase participation costs by mobilising countermovements and bolster legitimacy by leveraging the court as a revered institution. This new conceptual distinction thus captures regime innovation in counteracting protests and broadens the typology of regime responses.",
keywords = "contentious politics, regime response, occupy, Umbrella Movement, Hong Kong",
author = "YUEN, {Wai Hei, Samson} and CHENG, {Wai, Edmund}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0032321716674024",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "611--630",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Neither repression nor concession? A regime's attrition against mass protests. / YUEN, Wai Hei, Samson; CHENG, Wai, Edmund.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 65, No. 3, 01.10.2017, p. 611-630.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neither repression nor concession? A regime's attrition against mass protests

AU - YUEN, Wai Hei, Samson

AU - CHENG, Wai, Edmund

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Protest activists employ various strategies to challenge regimes, and regimes deploy multifaceted tactics to respond to such challenges. Existing studies on regime protest responses focus on repression and concession, but little attention is devoted to toleration, which is often regarded as government inaction. Drawing on primary sources and interviews, this article analyses regime responses to Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement to expand the conceptualisation of toleration. First, it demonstrates that regimes adapt multiple strategies to protesters’ reactions rather than adhering to a single response. Second, it shows that toleration, other than ignoring protests, entails proactive tactics that we summarise as attrition. While ‘tolerating’ street occupation, the regime sought to eliminate political opportunities by maintaining elite cohesion, increase participation costs by mobilising countermovements and bolster legitimacy by leveraging the court as a revered institution. This new conceptual distinction thus captures regime innovation in counteracting protests and broadens the typology of regime responses.

AB - Protest activists employ various strategies to challenge regimes, and regimes deploy multifaceted tactics to respond to such challenges. Existing studies on regime protest responses focus on repression and concession, but little attention is devoted to toleration, which is often regarded as government inaction. Drawing on primary sources and interviews, this article analyses regime responses to Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement to expand the conceptualisation of toleration. First, it demonstrates that regimes adapt multiple strategies to protesters’ reactions rather than adhering to a single response. Second, it shows that toleration, other than ignoring protests, entails proactive tactics that we summarise as attrition. While ‘tolerating’ street occupation, the regime sought to eliminate political opportunities by maintaining elite cohesion, increase participation costs by mobilising countermovements and bolster legitimacy by leveraging the court as a revered institution. This new conceptual distinction thus captures regime innovation in counteracting protests and broadens the typology of regime responses.

KW - contentious politics

KW - regime response

KW - occupy

KW - Umbrella Movement

KW - Hong Kong

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5939

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029522073&doi=10.1177%2f0032321716674024&partnerID=40&md5=1d2a462e63badaebd0b92e5125c4020c

U2 - 10.1177/0032321716674024

DO - 10.1177/0032321716674024

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 65

SP - 611

EP - 630

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 3

ER -