Of politics and social science : ‘Totalitarianism’ in the dialogue of David Riesman and Hannah Arendt

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the late 1940s and early 1950s, David Riesman and Hannah Arendt were engaged in an animated discussion about the meaning and character of totalitarianism. Their disagreement reflected, in part, different experiences and dissonant intellectual backgrounds. Arendt abhorred the social sciences, finding them pretentious and obfuscating. Riesman, in contrast, abandoned a career in law to take up the sociological vocation, which he combined with his own heterodox brand of humanistic psychology. This article delineates the stakes of the Arendt Riesman debate by examining Arendt’s critique of social science and Riesman’s defence of a sociological interpretation of totalitarianism. In addition, the article argues that Arendt’s theory of totalitarianism misdescribed the nature of Nazi and Bolshevik societies in ways that damaged her political account more generally. Riesman intuited that weakness and, as the following article shows, modern historical research has confirmed it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-217
Number of pages27
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Theory
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2004

Fingerprint

totalitarianism
social science
dialogue
politics
psychology
career
interpretation
Law
society
experience

Cite this

@article{4440afe72f614947942064ab93a04448,
title = "Of politics and social science : ‘Totalitarianism’ in the dialogue of David Riesman and Hannah Arendt",
abstract = "During the late 1940s and early 1950s, David Riesman and Hannah Arendt were engaged in an animated discussion about the meaning and character of totalitarianism. Their disagreement reflected, in part, different experiences and dissonant intellectual backgrounds. Arendt abhorred the social sciences, finding them pretentious and obfuscating. Riesman, in contrast, abandoned a career in law to take up the sociological vocation, which he combined with his own heterodox brand of humanistic psychology. This article delineates the stakes of the Arendt Riesman debate by examining Arendt’s critique of social science and Riesman’s defence of a sociological interpretation of totalitarianism. In addition, the article argues that Arendt’s theory of totalitarianism misdescribed the nature of Nazi and Bolshevik societies in ways that damaged her political account more generally. Riesman intuited that weakness and, as the following article shows, modern historical research has confirmed it.",
author = "BAEHR, {William Peter}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1474885104041047",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "191--217",
journal = "European Journal of Political Theory",
issn = "1474-8851",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Of politics and social science : ‘Totalitarianism’ in the dialogue of David Riesman and Hannah Arendt. / BAEHR, William Peter.

In: European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.04.2004, p. 191-217.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Of politics and social science : ‘Totalitarianism’ in the dialogue of David Riesman and Hannah Arendt

AU - BAEHR, William Peter

PY - 2004/4/1

Y1 - 2004/4/1

N2 - During the late 1940s and early 1950s, David Riesman and Hannah Arendt were engaged in an animated discussion about the meaning and character of totalitarianism. Their disagreement reflected, in part, different experiences and dissonant intellectual backgrounds. Arendt abhorred the social sciences, finding them pretentious and obfuscating. Riesman, in contrast, abandoned a career in law to take up the sociological vocation, which he combined with his own heterodox brand of humanistic psychology. This article delineates the stakes of the Arendt Riesman debate by examining Arendt’s critique of social science and Riesman’s defence of a sociological interpretation of totalitarianism. In addition, the article argues that Arendt’s theory of totalitarianism misdescribed the nature of Nazi and Bolshevik societies in ways that damaged her political account more generally. Riesman intuited that weakness and, as the following article shows, modern historical research has confirmed it.

AB - During the late 1940s and early 1950s, David Riesman and Hannah Arendt were engaged in an animated discussion about the meaning and character of totalitarianism. Their disagreement reflected, in part, different experiences and dissonant intellectual backgrounds. Arendt abhorred the social sciences, finding them pretentious and obfuscating. Riesman, in contrast, abandoned a career in law to take up the sociological vocation, which he combined with his own heterodox brand of humanistic psychology. This article delineates the stakes of the Arendt Riesman debate by examining Arendt’s critique of social science and Riesman’s defence of a sociological interpretation of totalitarianism. In addition, the article argues that Arendt’s theory of totalitarianism misdescribed the nature of Nazi and Bolshevik societies in ways that damaged her political account more generally. Riesman intuited that weakness and, as the following article shows, modern historical research has confirmed it.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5582

U2 - 10.1177/1474885104041047

DO - 10.1177/1474885104041047

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 3

SP - 191

EP - 217

JO - European Journal of Political Theory

JF - European Journal of Political Theory

SN - 1474-8851

IS - 2

ER -