Projects per year
Abstract
Human life has special importance. Human decisions must be granted special respect. It is natural to see these claims as connected. It seems likely that human life has value because human beings possess a unique capacity for self-determination. David Velleman’s argument that the nature of autonomy provides us with a prima facie case against the morally permissibility of suicide, at least in most cases, rests on highly questionable premises. Nonetheless, it does point to the importance of a proper understanding of seemingly arcane notions like the self and autonomy in giving principled and systematic answers to practical moral dilemmas. I will argue here that his case against suicide relies on a Kantian understanding of the nature of the self, and consequently of the nature of autonomy and how it should be respected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 244-257 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Asian Bioethics Review |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Thanks to Jack Woods, Bonnie Steinbock, an anonymous referee and the audience at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Centre for Bioethics’ “Workshop on Dying Well” for comments and criticisms.Keywords
- Frankfurt School
- Kant
- Nature of Autonomy Suicide
- Self-Determination
- Value of Human Life
- Velleman
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On rationally valuing one’s life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Autonomy as Self-Interpretation (作為自我詮釋之自主性)
BAKER, D. C. (PI)
Research Grants Council (HKSAR)
1/01/13 → 31/12/14
Project: Grant Research