Organizational effectiveness in higher education : managerial implications of a Hong Kong study

James Stuart POUNDER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quinn and Rohrbaugh's Competing Values Framework or Model has been proposed as 'a general paradigm of organisational effectiveness', yet the relevance of the model to higher educational organizations has never been tested. This paper describes the development of a set of organizational effectiveness self-rating scales for higher educational institutions in Hong Kong. The method of development tested the relevance of the effectiveness dimensions contained in the Competing Values Model to Hong Kong higher educational establishments. Rating scales were developed in four of the model's nine effectiveness dimensions. There are grounds for suggesting that these four dimensions constitute the core of a model of organizational effectiveness applicable to Hong Kong higher education. Additionally, the study raised some important managerial issues in higher education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-400
Number of pages12
JournalEducational Management and Administration
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 1999

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Organizational effectiveness in higher education : managerial implications of a Hong Kong study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this