Abstract
This study examines the impact of ownership structure on Chinese banks' risk-taking behaviours. We classify the Chinese commercial banks into three categories based on the types of controlling shareholder, and find that banks controlled by the government (GCBs) tend to take more risks than those controlled by state-owned enterprises (SOECBs) or private investors (PCBs). This is attributed to the severe political intervention and weak incentives to follow prudent bank management practices for GCBs. We also find that the results are more pronounced among banks with concentrated ownership presumably because the large controlling power helps to enhance the monitoring of the management and promotes prudent operating procedures. Our findings have important implications for the ongoing reform in the Chinese banking sector.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 120-130 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Review of Financial Analysis |
| Volume | 36 |
| Early online date | 2 Apr 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Bank
- Risk-taking
- State ownership
- Ownership concentration
- China
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ownership structure and risk-taking : comparative evidence from private and state-controlled banks in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver