Paradigm shift or business as usual : the search for new governance in higher education in Asia

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the disagreements and diverse interpretations of globalisation impacts on state capacity in governance, the dominant view is that globalisation has not only weakened the power of the state, but has also led to the end of the state (Zheng, 2004). It is against such a context that a growing number of modern states are beginning to rethink their governance strategies in coping with rapid social and economic changes. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, new forms of governance and new governance philosophies have emerged, which has inevitably affected the way the public sector and public service delivery are managed. Believing that modern states have undergone a metamorphosis, there has been a massive proliferation of tools and policy instruments such as a dizzying array of loans, loan guarantees, grants, contracts, insurance, vouchers, etc., as policy devices instead of relying solely upon government bureaucracies in terms of delivery of goods or services. Despite the fact that “governance” is a contested concept, political scientists and public administration scholars generally agree that postmodern societies require a shift in the state’s function from a “rowing” to a “steering” role.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-236
Number of pages4
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Education
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

governance
paradigm
education
loan
globalization
political scientist
economic change
bureaucracy
public administration
proliferation
insurance
public service
competitiveness
grant
social change
guarantee
public sector
coping
interpretation
society

Cite this

@article{63e8daf1db55430390911484fe1519f4,
title = "Paradigm shift or business as usual : the search for new governance in higher education in Asia",
abstract = "Despite the disagreements and diverse interpretations of globalisation impacts on state capacity in governance, the dominant view is that globalisation has not only weakened the power of the state, but has also led to the end of the state (Zheng, 2004). It is against such a context that a growing number of modern states are beginning to rethink their governance strategies in coping with rapid social and economic changes. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, new forms of governance and new governance philosophies have emerged, which has inevitably affected the way the public sector and public service delivery are managed. Believing that modern states have undergone a metamorphosis, there has been a massive proliferation of tools and policy instruments such as a dizzying array of loans, loan guarantees, grants, contracts, insurance, vouchers, etc., as policy devices instead of relying solely upon government bureaucracies in terms of delivery of goods or services. Despite the fact that “governance” is a contested concept, political scientists and public administration scholars generally agree that postmodern societies require a shift in the state’s function from a “rowing” to a “steering” role.",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua} and Jun OBA",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02188790701599157",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "233--236",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Education",
issn = "0218-8791",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Paradigm shift or business as usual : the search for new governance in higher education in Asia. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua; OBA, Jun.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.11.2007, p. 233-236.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradigm shift or business as usual : the search for new governance in higher education in Asia

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

AU - OBA, Jun

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Despite the disagreements and diverse interpretations of globalisation impacts on state capacity in governance, the dominant view is that globalisation has not only weakened the power of the state, but has also led to the end of the state (Zheng, 2004). It is against such a context that a growing number of modern states are beginning to rethink their governance strategies in coping with rapid social and economic changes. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, new forms of governance and new governance philosophies have emerged, which has inevitably affected the way the public sector and public service delivery are managed. Believing that modern states have undergone a metamorphosis, there has been a massive proliferation of tools and policy instruments such as a dizzying array of loans, loan guarantees, grants, contracts, insurance, vouchers, etc., as policy devices instead of relying solely upon government bureaucracies in terms of delivery of goods or services. Despite the fact that “governance” is a contested concept, political scientists and public administration scholars generally agree that postmodern societies require a shift in the state’s function from a “rowing” to a “steering” role.

AB - Despite the disagreements and diverse interpretations of globalisation impacts on state capacity in governance, the dominant view is that globalisation has not only weakened the power of the state, but has also led to the end of the state (Zheng, 2004). It is against such a context that a growing number of modern states are beginning to rethink their governance strategies in coping with rapid social and economic changes. In order to enhance their global competitiveness, new forms of governance and new governance philosophies have emerged, which has inevitably affected the way the public sector and public service delivery are managed. Believing that modern states have undergone a metamorphosis, there has been a massive proliferation of tools and policy instruments such as a dizzying array of loans, loan guarantees, grants, contracts, insurance, vouchers, etc., as policy devices instead of relying solely upon government bureaucracies in terms of delivery of goods or services. Despite the fact that “governance” is a contested concept, political scientists and public administration scholars generally agree that postmodern societies require a shift in the state’s function from a “rowing” to a “steering” role.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1425

U2 - 10.1080/02188790701599157

DO - 10.1080/02188790701599157

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 27

SP - 233

EP - 236

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Education

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Education

SN - 0218-8791

IS - 3

ER -