Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsPresentationPresentation

Abstract

We present a model of cumulative innovation where firms can conduct R&D in both a safe and a risky direction. Innovations in the risky direction produce quality improvements with higher expected sizes and variances. As patentability standards rise, an innovation in the risky direction is less likely to receive a patent that replaces the current technology, which decreases the static incentive for new entrants to conduct risky R&D, but increases their dynamic incentive because of the longer duration---and hence higher reward---for incumbency. These, together with a strategic substitution and a market structure effect, result in an inverted-U shape in the risky direction but a U shape in the safe direction for the relationship between R&D intensity and patentability standards. There exists a patentability standard that induces the efficient innovation direction, whereas R&D is biased towards (against) the risky direction under lower (higher) standards. The optimal patentability standard may distort the R&D direction to increase the industry innovation rate that is socially deficient.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2016
EventThe 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association - The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Duration: 12 Dec 201613 Dec 2016
http://www.hkea.org.hk/index.php/9th-conference

Conference

ConferenceThe 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association
CountryHong Kong
CityPokfulam
Period12/12/1613/12/16
OtherHong Kong Economic Association
Internet address

Fingerprint

Cumulative innovation
Innovation
Inverted-U
Incentives
Incumbency
New entrants
Market structure
Substitution
Reward
Quality improvement
Patents
Industry
Dynamic incentives

Cite this

ZHANG, T. (2016). Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation. The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
ZHANG, Tianle. / Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation. The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
@conference{d5b60ddd89f14520aa9f6a96a883bdb3,
title = "Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation",
abstract = "We present a model of cumulative innovation where firms can conduct R&D in both a safe and a risky direction. Innovations in the risky direction produce quality improvements with higher expected sizes and variances. As patentability standards rise, an innovation in the risky direction is less likely to receive a patent that replaces the current technology, which decreases the static incentive for new entrants to conduct risky R&D, but increases their dynamic incentive because of the longer duration---and hence higher reward---for incumbency. These, together with a strategic substitution and a market structure effect, result in an inverted-U shape in the risky direction but a U shape in the safe direction for the relationship between R&D intensity and patentability standards. There exists a patentability standard that induces the efficient innovation direction, whereas R&D is biased towards (against) the risky direction under lower (higher) standards. The optimal patentability standard may distort the R&D direction to increase the industry innovation rate that is socially deficient.",
author = "Tianle ZHANG",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "12",
language = "English",
note = "The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association ; Conference date: 12-12-2016 Through 13-12-2016",
url = "http://www.hkea.org.hk/index.php/9th-conference",

}

ZHANG, T 2016, 'Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation' The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, 12/12/16 - 13/12/16, .

Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation. / ZHANG, Tianle.

2016. The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

Research output: Other Conference ContributionsPresentationPresentation

TY - CONF

T1 - Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation

AU - ZHANG, Tianle

PY - 2016/12/12

Y1 - 2016/12/12

N2 - We present a model of cumulative innovation where firms can conduct R&D in both a safe and a risky direction. Innovations in the risky direction produce quality improvements with higher expected sizes and variances. As patentability standards rise, an innovation in the risky direction is less likely to receive a patent that replaces the current technology, which decreases the static incentive for new entrants to conduct risky R&D, but increases their dynamic incentive because of the longer duration---and hence higher reward---for incumbency. These, together with a strategic substitution and a market structure effect, result in an inverted-U shape in the risky direction but a U shape in the safe direction for the relationship between R&D intensity and patentability standards. There exists a patentability standard that induces the efficient innovation direction, whereas R&D is biased towards (against) the risky direction under lower (higher) standards. The optimal patentability standard may distort the R&D direction to increase the industry innovation rate that is socially deficient.

AB - We present a model of cumulative innovation where firms can conduct R&D in both a safe and a risky direction. Innovations in the risky direction produce quality improvements with higher expected sizes and variances. As patentability standards rise, an innovation in the risky direction is less likely to receive a patent that replaces the current technology, which decreases the static incentive for new entrants to conduct risky R&D, but increases their dynamic incentive because of the longer duration---and hence higher reward---for incumbency. These, together with a strategic substitution and a market structure effect, result in an inverted-U shape in the risky direction but a U shape in the safe direction for the relationship between R&D intensity and patentability standards. There exists a patentability standard that induces the efficient innovation direction, whereas R&D is biased towards (against) the risky direction under lower (higher) standards. The optimal patentability standard may distort the R&D direction to increase the industry innovation rate that is socially deficient.

UR - http://www.hkea.org.hk/index.php/hkea/2-home/60-abstract-2a4

UR - http://www.hkea.org.hk/index.php/9th-conference/9th-programme

M3 - Presentation

ER -

ZHANG T. Patentability, R&D Direction, and Cumulative Innovation. 2016. The 9th Biennial Conference of Hong Kong Economic Association, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.