Pension privatisation in Greater China : institutional patterns and policy outcomes

Shih Jiunn SHI, Ka Ho, Joshua MOK

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines rationales and processes for pension privatisation in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China since the 1990s. It argues that the configurations of the public/private pension mix in the three cases are related to their respective political-economic development. To achieve the reform of state-owned enterprises and labour markets, mainland China's pension reforms have concentrated on the combination of social pooling and individual accounts. Taiwan's reforms have rectified the Labour Insurance scheme and established individual accounts in order to alleviate enterprises' financial burdens while facilitating labour force mobility. Hong Kong has strengthened its service industry in favour of financial market fluidity, corresponding to a pro-market approach that prefers mandatory provident funds as the major pension scheme for workers. The diversification of pension privatisation manifests manifold institutional changes of old-age security, and raises an essential governance issue for the regulation of funded pension provision to ensure adequate income for older people.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S30-S45
JournalInternational Journal of Social Welfare
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pension
privatization
China
Hong Kong
Taiwan
private pension
pension reform
reform
institutional change
financial market
old age
labor force
diversification
insurance
labor market
governance
labor
worker
income
regulation

Cite this

@article{876d48f73d5b4edebff8bd94e6a912dd,
title = "Pension privatisation in Greater China : institutional patterns and policy outcomes",
abstract = "This article examines rationales and processes for pension privatisation in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China since the 1990s. It argues that the configurations of the public/private pension mix in the three cases are related to their respective political-economic development. To achieve the reform of state-owned enterprises and labour markets, mainland China's pension reforms have concentrated on the combination of social pooling and individual accounts. Taiwan's reforms have rectified the Labour Insurance scheme and established individual accounts in order to alleviate enterprises' financial burdens while facilitating labour force mobility. Hong Kong has strengthened its service industry in favour of financial market fluidity, corresponding to a pro-market approach that prefers mandatory provident funds as the major pension scheme for workers. The diversification of pension privatisation manifests manifold institutional changes of old-age security, and raises an essential governance issue for the regulation of funded pension provision to ensure adequate income for older people.",
author = "SHI, {Shih Jiunn} and MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00875.x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "S30--S45",
journal = "International Journal of Social Welfare",
issn = "1369-6866",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

}

Pension privatisation in Greater China : institutional patterns and policy outcomes. / SHI, Shih Jiunn; MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua.

In: International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 21, 01.10.2012, p. S30-S45.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pension privatisation in Greater China : institutional patterns and policy outcomes

AU - SHI, Shih Jiunn

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - This article examines rationales and processes for pension privatisation in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China since the 1990s. It argues that the configurations of the public/private pension mix in the three cases are related to their respective political-economic development. To achieve the reform of state-owned enterprises and labour markets, mainland China's pension reforms have concentrated on the combination of social pooling and individual accounts. Taiwan's reforms have rectified the Labour Insurance scheme and established individual accounts in order to alleviate enterprises' financial burdens while facilitating labour force mobility. Hong Kong has strengthened its service industry in favour of financial market fluidity, corresponding to a pro-market approach that prefers mandatory provident funds as the major pension scheme for workers. The diversification of pension privatisation manifests manifold institutional changes of old-age security, and raises an essential governance issue for the regulation of funded pension provision to ensure adequate income for older people.

AB - This article examines rationales and processes for pension privatisation in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China since the 1990s. It argues that the configurations of the public/private pension mix in the three cases are related to their respective political-economic development. To achieve the reform of state-owned enterprises and labour markets, mainland China's pension reforms have concentrated on the combination of social pooling and individual accounts. Taiwan's reforms have rectified the Labour Insurance scheme and established individual accounts in order to alleviate enterprises' financial burdens while facilitating labour force mobility. Hong Kong has strengthened its service industry in favour of financial market fluidity, corresponding to a pro-market approach that prefers mandatory provident funds as the major pension scheme for workers. The diversification of pension privatisation manifests manifold institutional changes of old-age security, and raises an essential governance issue for the regulation of funded pension provision to ensure adequate income for older people.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1479

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00875.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00875.x

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 21

SP - S30-S45

JO - International Journal of Social Welfare

JF - International Journal of Social Welfare

SN - 1369-6866

ER -