Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making : from psychology to medicine

Yau Wai, Simon LI, Tim RAKOW, Ben R. NEWELL

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional decision research shows that when people are told the probability of a rare event (e.g. the chance of side effects), they generally treat this event as if it were more likely than its objective probability (overweighting). In contrast, recent studies indicate that when outcomes are experienced firsthand, people tend to underweight the probability of rare events. In this paper, we suggest that the distinction between described and experienced information can play a significant role in shared decision making, and can provide a plausible explanation for some discrepancies between the perspectives of doctors and patients. We highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of experiential and description-based information, and how knowledge of these might be used to improve risk communication.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-995
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Medicine
Psychology
Thinness
Communication
Research

Cite this

@article{a155f38d8fda4b5493032394c5c9a187,
title = "Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making : from psychology to medicine",
abstract = "Traditional decision research shows that when people are told the probability of a rare event (e.g. the chance of side effects), they generally treat this event as if it were more likely than its objective probability (overweighting). In contrast, recent studies indicate that when outcomes are experienced firsthand, people tend to underweight the probability of rare events. In this paper, we suggest that the distinction between described and experienced information can play a significant role in shared decision making, and can provide a plausible explanation for some discrepancies between the perspectives of doctors and patients. We highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of experiential and description-based information, and how knowledge of these might be used to improve risk communication.",
author = "LI, {Yau Wai, Simon} and Tim RAKOW and NEWELL, {Ben R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01350.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "993--995",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making : from psychology to medicine. / LI, Yau Wai, Simon; RAKOW, Tim; NEWELL, Ben R.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.12.2009, p. 993-995.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making : from psychology to medicine

AU - LI, Yau Wai, Simon

AU - RAKOW, Tim

AU - NEWELL, Ben R.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Traditional decision research shows that when people are told the probability of a rare event (e.g. the chance of side effects), they generally treat this event as if it were more likely than its objective probability (overweighting). In contrast, recent studies indicate that when outcomes are experienced firsthand, people tend to underweight the probability of rare events. In this paper, we suggest that the distinction between described and experienced information can play a significant role in shared decision making, and can provide a plausible explanation for some discrepancies between the perspectives of doctors and patients. We highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of experiential and description-based information, and how knowledge of these might be used to improve risk communication.

AB - Traditional decision research shows that when people are told the probability of a rare event (e.g. the chance of side effects), they generally treat this event as if it were more likely than its objective probability (overweighting). In contrast, recent studies indicate that when outcomes are experienced firsthand, people tend to underweight the probability of rare events. In this paper, we suggest that the distinction between described and experienced information can play a significant role in shared decision making, and can provide a plausible explanation for some discrepancies between the perspectives of doctors and patients. We highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of experiential and description-based information, and how knowledge of these might be used to improve risk communication.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/450

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01350.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01350.x

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

C2 - 20367698

VL - 15

SP - 993

EP - 995

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 6

ER -