Philosophical perspectives on literary value

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Meta-axiological distinctions introduced here introduced here include cognitivism and non-cognitivism on the status of evaluative discourse, as well as revisionary and non-revisionary positions. I argue that anti-realist and error-theoretical views of evaluative claims tend to be revisionary in ways that conflict with the realist orientation of much evaluative discourse, yet I contend that this does not provide a decisive reason in favor of cognitivism. While categorical aesthetic imperatives are hard to justify, some of these hypothetical imperatives have important implications in arguments over literary value. Dispositional accounts of value and 'ideal judge' conditions are also canvassed. In what follows I shall take up some central issues in meta-axiology, the branch of philosophy that engages in second-order reflection over values and evaluative discourse (for background, Darwell et al. 1993; Sinnott-Armstrong and Timmons 1996). My highly selective survey will be conducted with an eye to the implications of key philosophical strategies for questions pertaining to the topic of literary value. I propose no systematic theory of the latter, but do schematically indicate what I take to be some cogent basic assumptions and lines of future enquiry.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages209-221
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9789027233363
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Discourse
Cognitivism
Non-cognitivism
Anti-realist
Philosophy
Aesthetics
Hypothetical Imperative
Realist
Axiology
Categorical
Ideal

Cite this

LIVINGSTON, P. N. (2008). Philosophical perspectives on literary value. In The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation (pp. 209-221). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4.15liv
LIVINGSTON, Paisley Nathan. / Philosophical perspectives on literary value. The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008. pp. 209-221
@inbook{3588cf7869cc42c2ac092fd52ceb8891,
title = "Philosophical perspectives on literary value",
abstract = "Meta-axiological distinctions introduced here introduced here include cognitivism and non-cognitivism on the status of evaluative discourse, as well as revisionary and non-revisionary positions. I argue that anti-realist and error-theoretical views of evaluative claims tend to be revisionary in ways that conflict with the realist orientation of much evaluative discourse, yet I contend that this does not provide a decisive reason in favor of cognitivism. While categorical aesthetic imperatives are hard to justify, some of these hypothetical imperatives have important implications in arguments over literary value. Dispositional accounts of value and 'ideal judge' conditions are also canvassed. In what follows I shall take up some central issues in meta-axiology, the branch of philosophy that engages in second-order reflection over values and evaluative discourse (for background, Darwell et al. 1993; Sinnott-Armstrong and Timmons 1996). My highly selective survey will be conducted with an eye to the implications of key philosophical strategies for questions pertaining to the topic of literary value. I propose no systematic theory of the latter, but do schematically indicate what I take to be some cogent basic assumptions and lines of future enquiry.",
author = "LIVINGSTON, {Paisley Nathan}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/lal.4.15liv",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027233363",
pages = "209--221",
booktitle = "The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
address = "Netherlands",

}

LIVINGSTON, PN 2008, Philosophical perspectives on literary value. in The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4.15liv

Philosophical perspectives on literary value. / LIVINGSTON, Paisley Nathan.

The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008. p. 209-221.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Philosophical perspectives on literary value

AU - LIVINGSTON, Paisley Nathan

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Meta-axiological distinctions introduced here introduced here include cognitivism and non-cognitivism on the status of evaluative discourse, as well as revisionary and non-revisionary positions. I argue that anti-realist and error-theoretical views of evaluative claims tend to be revisionary in ways that conflict with the realist orientation of much evaluative discourse, yet I contend that this does not provide a decisive reason in favor of cognitivism. While categorical aesthetic imperatives are hard to justify, some of these hypothetical imperatives have important implications in arguments over literary value. Dispositional accounts of value and 'ideal judge' conditions are also canvassed. In what follows I shall take up some central issues in meta-axiology, the branch of philosophy that engages in second-order reflection over values and evaluative discourse (for background, Darwell et al. 1993; Sinnott-Armstrong and Timmons 1996). My highly selective survey will be conducted with an eye to the implications of key philosophical strategies for questions pertaining to the topic of literary value. I propose no systematic theory of the latter, but do schematically indicate what I take to be some cogent basic assumptions and lines of future enquiry.

AB - Meta-axiological distinctions introduced here introduced here include cognitivism and non-cognitivism on the status of evaluative discourse, as well as revisionary and non-revisionary positions. I argue that anti-realist and error-theoretical views of evaluative claims tend to be revisionary in ways that conflict with the realist orientation of much evaluative discourse, yet I contend that this does not provide a decisive reason in favor of cognitivism. While categorical aesthetic imperatives are hard to justify, some of these hypothetical imperatives have important implications in arguments over literary value. Dispositional accounts of value and 'ideal judge' conditions are also canvassed. In what follows I shall take up some central issues in meta-axiology, the branch of philosophy that engages in second-order reflection over values and evaluative discourse (for background, Darwell et al. 1993; Sinnott-Armstrong and Timmons 1996). My highly selective survey will be conducted with an eye to the implications of key philosophical strategies for questions pertaining to the topic of literary value. I propose no systematic theory of the latter, but do schematically indicate what I take to be some cogent basic assumptions and lines of future enquiry.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4245

U2 - 10.1075/lal.4.15liv

DO - 10.1075/lal.4.15liv

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9789027233363

SP - 209

EP - 221

BT - The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

ER -

LIVINGSTON PN. Philosophical perspectives on literary value. In The quality of literature : linguistic studies in literary evaluation. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2008. p. 209-221 https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.4.15liv