Politics and governance in contemporary India : the paradox of democratic deepening

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

On 15 Aug 1997, India celebrated 50 years as an independent nation. Except for a brief 18 months between 1975-1977, India has remained a democracy. What explains the resilience of democracy in India in the face of a low-income economy, widespread poverty, illiteracy, and immense religious and ethnic diversity? How have democratic governance shaped political and socioeconomic change? What is the future of Indian democracy? This paper argues that the "deepening of democracy" has tended to exacerbate the problems of governance. Specifically, the progressive empowerment of popular sectors has created new sets of problems. India's civil society and associational life, divided along narrow caste, ethnic, regional, and religious divisions, lack "social capital" and "civicness" necessary for the articulation and aggregation of interests, effective political collaboration, and good governance. Compounding these problems, the high levels of political mobilization in the absence of strong and responsive state institutions and political parties have served to fragment rather than unite society. Thus, instead of responding to the demands of an increasingly mobilized population, the country's weak and overburdened political institutions have reinforced, if not exacerbated, socioeconomic and political cleavage. Not surprisingly, despite India's resilient democratic institutions and relatively long experience with constitutionalism, effective governance remains a major challenge. Given these challenges, what India needs is the resuscitation of its public institutions and the renegotiation of state-society relations. This paper concludes by illustrating that India's democracy is potentially self-correcting along these lines. 34 References.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-101
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of International and Area Studies
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

governance
India
politics
democracy
illiteracy
constitutionalism
socioeconomic development
political interest
good governance
public institution
caste
political institution
political change
aggregation
resilience
social capital
mobilization
civil society
empowerment
low income

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Indian politics
  • Civil society
  • Governance

Cite this

@article{8b6898ab70444afd8321e32dc98602d6,
title = "Politics and governance in contemporary India : the paradox of democratic deepening",
abstract = "On 15 Aug 1997, India celebrated 50 years as an independent nation. Except for a brief 18 months between 1975-1977, India has remained a democracy. What explains the resilience of democracy in India in the face of a low-income economy, widespread poverty, illiteracy, and immense religious and ethnic diversity? How have democratic governance shaped political and socioeconomic change? What is the future of Indian democracy? This paper argues that the {"}deepening of democracy{"} has tended to exacerbate the problems of governance. Specifically, the progressive empowerment of popular sectors has created new sets of problems. India's civil society and associational life, divided along narrow caste, ethnic, regional, and religious divisions, lack {"}social capital{"} and {"}civicness{"} necessary for the articulation and aggregation of interests, effective political collaboration, and good governance. Compounding these problems, the high levels of political mobilization in the absence of strong and responsive state institutions and political parties have served to fragment rather than unite society. Thus, instead of responding to the demands of an increasingly mobilized population, the country's weak and overburdened political institutions have reinforced, if not exacerbated, socioeconomic and political cleavage. Not surprisingly, despite India's resilient democratic institutions and relatively long experience with constitutionalism, effective governance remains a major challenge. Given these challenges, what India needs is the resuscitation of its public institutions and the renegotiation of state-society relations. This paper concludes by illustrating that India's democracy is potentially self-correcting along these lines. 34 References.",
keywords = "Democracy, Indian politics, Civil society, Governance",
author = "SHARMA, {Shalendra D.}",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "77--101",
journal = "Journal of International and Area Studies",
issn = "1226-8550",
number = "1",

}

Politics and governance in contemporary India : the paradox of democratic deepening. / SHARMA, Shalendra D.

In: Journal of International and Area Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.06.2002, p. 77-101.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politics and governance in contemporary India : the paradox of democratic deepening

AU - SHARMA, Shalendra D.

PY - 2002/6/1

Y1 - 2002/6/1

N2 - On 15 Aug 1997, India celebrated 50 years as an independent nation. Except for a brief 18 months between 1975-1977, India has remained a democracy. What explains the resilience of democracy in India in the face of a low-income economy, widespread poverty, illiteracy, and immense religious and ethnic diversity? How have democratic governance shaped political and socioeconomic change? What is the future of Indian democracy? This paper argues that the "deepening of democracy" has tended to exacerbate the problems of governance. Specifically, the progressive empowerment of popular sectors has created new sets of problems. India's civil society and associational life, divided along narrow caste, ethnic, regional, and religious divisions, lack "social capital" and "civicness" necessary for the articulation and aggregation of interests, effective political collaboration, and good governance. Compounding these problems, the high levels of political mobilization in the absence of strong and responsive state institutions and political parties have served to fragment rather than unite society. Thus, instead of responding to the demands of an increasingly mobilized population, the country's weak and overburdened political institutions have reinforced, if not exacerbated, socioeconomic and political cleavage. Not surprisingly, despite India's resilient democratic institutions and relatively long experience with constitutionalism, effective governance remains a major challenge. Given these challenges, what India needs is the resuscitation of its public institutions and the renegotiation of state-society relations. This paper concludes by illustrating that India's democracy is potentially self-correcting along these lines. 34 References.

AB - On 15 Aug 1997, India celebrated 50 years as an independent nation. Except for a brief 18 months between 1975-1977, India has remained a democracy. What explains the resilience of democracy in India in the face of a low-income economy, widespread poverty, illiteracy, and immense religious and ethnic diversity? How have democratic governance shaped political and socioeconomic change? What is the future of Indian democracy? This paper argues that the "deepening of democracy" has tended to exacerbate the problems of governance. Specifically, the progressive empowerment of popular sectors has created new sets of problems. India's civil society and associational life, divided along narrow caste, ethnic, regional, and religious divisions, lack "social capital" and "civicness" necessary for the articulation and aggregation of interests, effective political collaboration, and good governance. Compounding these problems, the high levels of political mobilization in the absence of strong and responsive state institutions and political parties have served to fragment rather than unite society. Thus, instead of responding to the demands of an increasingly mobilized population, the country's weak and overburdened political institutions have reinforced, if not exacerbated, socioeconomic and political cleavage. Not surprisingly, despite India's resilient democratic institutions and relatively long experience with constitutionalism, effective governance remains a major challenge. Given these challenges, what India needs is the resuscitation of its public institutions and the renegotiation of state-society relations. This paper concludes by illustrating that India's democracy is potentially self-correcting along these lines. 34 References.

KW - Democracy

KW - Indian politics

KW - Civil society

KW - Governance

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3481

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 9

SP - 77

EP - 101

JO - Journal of International and Area Studies

JF - Journal of International and Area Studies

SN - 1226-8550

IS - 1

ER -