Politics by other means : postdigital gameplay in Hong Kong

Rolien Susanne HOYNG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

This article considers play in relation to the governance of creativity as well as emerging modes of dissent in Hong Kong. Drawing from post-digital game studies and radical contextualism, the article considers play in three everyday settings, each of which articulates different relations between the material affordances of software, embodied capabilities and the rationalities of institutional macropolitics. In doing so, I aim to explore play as dissent in a context where play is instrumentalised for the biopolitics of the “creative” economy, yet where it is neither connected to “free” expression and performance nor guaranteed of liberal protections. I argue that creativity in Hong Kong is not constitutive—be it of economic assets or a “free” society—but constituted. That is to say, creativity is normalised, trained, excluded, repressed and potentially criminalised. This requires rethinking prevailing universalisms regarding politics as play and creative public performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-299
Number of pages16
JournalJavnost
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

creativity
Hong Kong
Economics
politics
rationality
performance
assets
governance
economy
economics
software

Keywords

  • Biopolitics
  • Creativity
  • Digital games
  • Digital labour
  • Dissent
  • Hong Kong

Cite this

HOYNG, Rolien Susanne. / Politics by other means : postdigital gameplay in Hong Kong. In: Javnost. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 284-299.
@article{8dabcaba86634c92bb54f978cd63da7d,
title = "Politics by other means : postdigital gameplay in Hong Kong",
abstract = "This article considers play in relation to the governance of creativity as well as emerging modes of dissent in Hong Kong. Drawing from post-digital game studies and radical contextualism, the article considers play in three everyday settings, each of which articulates different relations between the material affordances of software, embodied capabilities and the rationalities of institutional macropolitics. In doing so, I aim to explore play as dissent in a context where play is instrumentalised for the biopolitics of the “creative” economy, yet where it is neither connected to “free” expression and performance nor guaranteed of liberal protections. I argue that creativity in Hong Kong is not constitutive—be it of economic assets or a “free” society—but constituted. That is to say, creativity is normalised, trained, excluded, repressed and potentially criminalised. This requires rethinking prevailing universalisms regarding politics as play and creative public performance.",
keywords = "Biopolitics, Creativity, Digital games, Digital labour, Dissent, Hong Kong",
author = "HOYNG, {Rolien Susanne}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13183222.2017.1306189",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "284--299",
journal = "Javnost",
issn = "1318-3222",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Politics by other means : postdigital gameplay in Hong Kong. / HOYNG, Rolien Susanne.

In: Javnost, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 284-299.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politics by other means : postdigital gameplay in Hong Kong

AU - HOYNG, Rolien Susanne

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This article considers play in relation to the governance of creativity as well as emerging modes of dissent in Hong Kong. Drawing from post-digital game studies and radical contextualism, the article considers play in three everyday settings, each of which articulates different relations between the material affordances of software, embodied capabilities and the rationalities of institutional macropolitics. In doing so, I aim to explore play as dissent in a context where play is instrumentalised for the biopolitics of the “creative” economy, yet where it is neither connected to “free” expression and performance nor guaranteed of liberal protections. I argue that creativity in Hong Kong is not constitutive—be it of economic assets or a “free” society—but constituted. That is to say, creativity is normalised, trained, excluded, repressed and potentially criminalised. This requires rethinking prevailing universalisms regarding politics as play and creative public performance.

AB - This article considers play in relation to the governance of creativity as well as emerging modes of dissent in Hong Kong. Drawing from post-digital game studies and radical contextualism, the article considers play in three everyday settings, each of which articulates different relations between the material affordances of software, embodied capabilities and the rationalities of institutional macropolitics. In doing so, I aim to explore play as dissent in a context where play is instrumentalised for the biopolitics of the “creative” economy, yet where it is neither connected to “free” expression and performance nor guaranteed of liberal protections. I argue that creativity in Hong Kong is not constitutive—be it of economic assets or a “free” society—but constituted. That is to say, creativity is normalised, trained, excluded, repressed and potentially criminalised. This requires rethinking prevailing universalisms regarding politics as play and creative public performance.

KW - Biopolitics

KW - Creativity

KW - Digital games

KW - Digital labour

KW - Dissent

KW - Hong Kong

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6732

U2 - 10.1080/13183222.2017.1306189

DO - 10.1080/13183222.2017.1306189

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 24

SP - 284

EP - 299

JO - Javnost

JF - Javnost

SN - 1318-3222

IS - 3

ER -