Abstract
Knee points, characterized as a small improvement on one objective can lead to a significant degradation on at least one of the other objectives, are attractive to decision makers (DMs) in multicriterion decision making. This article presents a simple and effective knee point identification (KPI) method to help DMs identify solution(s) of interest from a given set of tradeoff solutions thus facilitating posterior decision making. Our basic idea is to sequentially validate whether a solution is a knee point or not by comparing its localized tradeoff utility with others within its neighborhood characterized from a decomposition perspective. In particular, a solution is a knee point if and only if it has the best-localized tradeoff utility among its neighbors. We implement a GPU version that carries out the KPI in a parallel manner. This GPU version reduces the worst-case complexity from quadratic to linear. The performance of our proposed method is compared with five state-of-the-art KPI methods on 134 test problem instances and two real-world engineering design problems. Empirical results demonstrate its outstanding performance especially on problems with many local knee points. We further validate the usefulness of our proposed method for guiding evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms to search for knee points on the fly during the evolutionary process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1409-1423 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 28 Sept 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 1997-2012 IEEE.
Funding
This work was supported in part by the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship under Grant MR/S017062/1; in part by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under Grant 2404317; in part by Royal Society under Grant IES\R2\212077; in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62076056; and in part by Amazon Research Awards. The work of Xin Yao was supported in part by the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-Inspired Intelligent Computation; in part by the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams under Grant 2017ZT07X386; in part by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program under Grant KQTD2016112514355531; and in part by the Program for University Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province under Grant 2017KSYS008
Keywords
- Decomposition
- evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO)
- knee point
- multicriterion decision making (MCDM)