Pre-commitment vs. flexibility: Uncertainty and distribution reform in P.R. China

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

Chinese economic reform is remarkably different from the East European reforms in which the Chinese model emphasizes competition over privatization. This paper explains why Chinese distribution reform is successful although the Chinese government has made no attempt in privatizing her inefficient state-owned enterprises. By extending Coughlan's (1985) price competition model to endogenize the pre-commitment versus flexibility decision, it is shown that reducing uncertainty can encourage enterprises to pre-commit their investment which allows further development of the retail sectors. This result supports the gradual pace of distribution reform policy of China. By contrast, the “revolutionary” East European model inevitably creates high uncertainty in the society and enterprises are unwilling to pre-commit their investment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-78
Number of pages20
JournalThe Journal of Socio-Economics
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
PR China
Precommitment
Price competition
Economic reform
State-owned enterprises
Government
China
Retail sector
Privatization
Policy reform

Cite this

@article{a40733aa9b0b4d51b436ea33420f830d,
title = "Pre-commitment vs. flexibility: Uncertainty and distribution reform in P.R. China",
abstract = "Chinese economic reform is remarkably different from the East European reforms in which the Chinese model emphasizes competition over privatization. This paper explains why Chinese distribution reform is successful although the Chinese government has made no attempt in privatizing her inefficient state-owned enterprises. By extending Coughlan's (1985) price competition model to endogenize the pre-commitment versus flexibility decision, it is shown that reducing uncertainty can encourage enterprises to pre-commit their investment which allows further development of the retail sectors. This result supports the gradual pace of distribution reform policy of China. By contrast, the “revolutionary” East European model inevitably creates high uncertainty in the society and enterprises are unwilling to pre-commit their investment.",
author = "CHOW, {Kong Wing, Clement}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1053-5357(97)90052-4",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "59--78",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics",
issn = "2214-8043",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Pre-commitment vs. flexibility: Uncertainty and distribution reform in P.R. China. / CHOW, Kong Wing, Clement.

In: The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 59-78.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pre-commitment vs. flexibility: Uncertainty and distribution reform in P.R. China

AU - CHOW, Kong Wing, Clement

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Chinese economic reform is remarkably different from the East European reforms in which the Chinese model emphasizes competition over privatization. This paper explains why Chinese distribution reform is successful although the Chinese government has made no attempt in privatizing her inefficient state-owned enterprises. By extending Coughlan's (1985) price competition model to endogenize the pre-commitment versus flexibility decision, it is shown that reducing uncertainty can encourage enterprises to pre-commit their investment which allows further development of the retail sectors. This result supports the gradual pace of distribution reform policy of China. By contrast, the “revolutionary” East European model inevitably creates high uncertainty in the society and enterprises are unwilling to pre-commit their investment.

AB - Chinese economic reform is remarkably different from the East European reforms in which the Chinese model emphasizes competition over privatization. This paper explains why Chinese distribution reform is successful although the Chinese government has made no attempt in privatizing her inefficient state-owned enterprises. By extending Coughlan's (1985) price competition model to endogenize the pre-commitment versus flexibility decision, it is shown that reducing uncertainty can encourage enterprises to pre-commit their investment which allows further development of the retail sectors. This result supports the gradual pace of distribution reform policy of China. By contrast, the “revolutionary” East European model inevitably creates high uncertainty in the society and enterprises are unwilling to pre-commit their investment.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4618

U2 - 10.1016/S1053-5357(97)90052-4

DO - 10.1016/S1053-5357(97)90052-4

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 26

SP - 59

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

SN - 2214-8043

IS - 1

ER -