Productive welfare, the East Asian ‘model’ and beyond : placing welfare types in Greater China into context

John HUDSON, Stefan KÜHNER, Nan YANG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article rounds off the themed section by reviewing broader debates within welfare state modelling relevant to Greater China. More specifically, it examines the now well-established literature around the East Asian ‘model’ of welfare, and related debates on the notion of a ‘productive welfare’ model. In so doing, it challenges simplistic classifications that present the region as representing a single model of welfare and, instead, highlights the diversity of welfare provision found within both Greater China and East Asia more generally. Building on the authors’ earlier published work comparing East Asian welfare systems with those found across the OECD, it also challenges claims that the region is home to a distinct ‘productive’ model of welfare. The article ends by highlighting some key drivers that will shape future debates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-315
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Volume13
Issue number2
Early online date2 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

welfare
China
OECD
welfare state
driver

Keywords

  • Comparative social policy
  • East Asia, welfare productivism
  • welfare regimes

Cite this

@article{220b86073b71434dae0722fe0e28d831,
title = "Productive welfare, the East Asian ‘model’ and beyond : placing welfare types in Greater China into context",
abstract = "This article rounds off the themed section by reviewing broader debates within welfare state modelling relevant to Greater China. More specifically, it examines the now well-established literature around the East Asian ‘model’ of welfare, and related debates on the notion of a ‘productive welfare’ model. In so doing, it challenges simplistic classifications that present the region as representing a single model of welfare and, instead, highlights the diversity of welfare provision found within both Greater China and East Asia more generally. Building on the authors’ earlier published work comparing East Asian welfare systems with those found across the OECD, it also challenges claims that the region is home to a distinct ‘productive’ model of welfare. The article ends by highlighting some key drivers that will shape future debates.",
keywords = "Comparative social policy, East Asia, welfare productivism, welfare regimes",
author = "John HUDSON and Stefan K{\"U}HNER and Nan YANG",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S1474746413000572",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "301--315",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1474-7464",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Productive welfare, the East Asian ‘model’ and beyond : placing welfare types in Greater China into context. / HUDSON, John; KÜHNER, Stefan; YANG, Nan.

In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 301-315.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Productive welfare, the East Asian ‘model’ and beyond : placing welfare types in Greater China into context

AU - HUDSON, John

AU - KÜHNER, Stefan

AU - YANG, Nan

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - This article rounds off the themed section by reviewing broader debates within welfare state modelling relevant to Greater China. More specifically, it examines the now well-established literature around the East Asian ‘model’ of welfare, and related debates on the notion of a ‘productive welfare’ model. In so doing, it challenges simplistic classifications that present the region as representing a single model of welfare and, instead, highlights the diversity of welfare provision found within both Greater China and East Asia more generally. Building on the authors’ earlier published work comparing East Asian welfare systems with those found across the OECD, it also challenges claims that the region is home to a distinct ‘productive’ model of welfare. The article ends by highlighting some key drivers that will shape future debates.

AB - This article rounds off the themed section by reviewing broader debates within welfare state modelling relevant to Greater China. More specifically, it examines the now well-established literature around the East Asian ‘model’ of welfare, and related debates on the notion of a ‘productive welfare’ model. In so doing, it challenges simplistic classifications that present the region as representing a single model of welfare and, instead, highlights the diversity of welfare provision found within both Greater China and East Asia more generally. Building on the authors’ earlier published work comparing East Asian welfare systems with those found across the OECD, it also challenges claims that the region is home to a distinct ‘productive’ model of welfare. The article ends by highlighting some key drivers that will shape future debates.

KW - Comparative social policy

KW - East Asia, welfare productivism

KW - welfare regimes

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4768

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84903273715&doi=10.1017%2fS1474746413000572&partnerID=40&md5=175f3c65bd222f738e5a0937d205f374

U2 - 10.1017/S1474746413000572

DO - 10.1017/S1474746413000572

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 13

SP - 301

EP - 315

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1474-7464

IS - 2

ER -