Public Assistance Eligibility and the Well-Being of Poor People in China

Chak Kwan Chan*, Jie Lei

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

This study adopted content analysis to examine policy papers concerning the eligibility requirements of the Minimum Living Standard Scheme (MLSS) in China's 31 capital cities. It was found that local officials not only assess applicants’ assets and incomes, but also their living space, quality of home decoration, possession of luxury goods, leisure activities, and behavior. The local governments’ use of a lifestyle assessment approach is caused by financial constraints and the lack of an effective mechanism to check applicants’ incomes. The lifestyle approach leads to regional inequalities in accessing public assistance, because some of the terms, which define the quality of life, are too ambiguous. The lifestyle approach, which requires applicants to live in very poor living conditions and also demonstrate their hardship to local officials, will be a barrier preventing poor people from being integrated into their communities. This study suggests that the key words and terms in the policy documents need to be clearly explained and similar criteria should also be adopted across different regions. It also proposes that the gap between MLSS eligibility criteria in the policy papers and their actual implementation requires further study in order to understand the impact of special local factors and the quality of life of poor people in China.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-447
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Social Service Research
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

applicant
assistance
well-being
living standard
China
quality of life
income
local factors
luxury
capital city
living conditions
possession
content analysis
assets
lack
community

Keywords

  • Eligibility criteria
  • fiscal disparities
  • inequality
  • lifestyle assessment approach
  • social exclusion
  • stigmatization

Cite this

@article{b70f15e35fbd4e58a0201dcfb641399f,
title = "Public Assistance Eligibility and the Well-Being of Poor People in China",
abstract = "This study adopted content analysis to examine policy papers concerning the eligibility requirements of the Minimum Living Standard Scheme (MLSS) in China's 31 capital cities. It was found that local officials not only assess applicants’ assets and incomes, but also their living space, quality of home decoration, possession of luxury goods, leisure activities, and behavior. The local governments’ use of a lifestyle assessment approach is caused by financial constraints and the lack of an effective mechanism to check applicants’ incomes. The lifestyle approach leads to regional inequalities in accessing public assistance, because some of the terms, which define the quality of life, are too ambiguous. The lifestyle approach, which requires applicants to live in very poor living conditions and also demonstrate their hardship to local officials, will be a barrier preventing poor people from being integrated into their communities. This study suggests that the key words and terms in the policy documents need to be clearly explained and similar criteria should also be adopted across different regions. It also proposes that the gap between MLSS eligibility criteria in the policy papers and their actual implementation requires further study in order to understand the impact of special local factors and the quality of life of poor people in China.",
keywords = "Eligibility criteria, fiscal disparities, inequality, lifestyle assessment approach, social exclusion, stigmatization",
author = "Chan, {Chak Kwan} and Jie Lei",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/01488376.2018.1476294",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "437--447",
journal = "Journal of Social Service Research",
issn = "0148-8376",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Public Assistance Eligibility and the Well-Being of Poor People in China. / Chan, Chak Kwan; Lei, Jie.

In: Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, 08.08.2018, p. 437-447.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Assistance Eligibility and the Well-Being of Poor People in China

AU - Chan, Chak Kwan

AU - Lei, Jie

PY - 2018/8/8

Y1 - 2018/8/8

N2 - This study adopted content analysis to examine policy papers concerning the eligibility requirements of the Minimum Living Standard Scheme (MLSS) in China's 31 capital cities. It was found that local officials not only assess applicants’ assets and incomes, but also their living space, quality of home decoration, possession of luxury goods, leisure activities, and behavior. The local governments’ use of a lifestyle assessment approach is caused by financial constraints and the lack of an effective mechanism to check applicants’ incomes. The lifestyle approach leads to regional inequalities in accessing public assistance, because some of the terms, which define the quality of life, are too ambiguous. The lifestyle approach, which requires applicants to live in very poor living conditions and also demonstrate their hardship to local officials, will be a barrier preventing poor people from being integrated into their communities. This study suggests that the key words and terms in the policy documents need to be clearly explained and similar criteria should also be adopted across different regions. It also proposes that the gap between MLSS eligibility criteria in the policy papers and their actual implementation requires further study in order to understand the impact of special local factors and the quality of life of poor people in China.

AB - This study adopted content analysis to examine policy papers concerning the eligibility requirements of the Minimum Living Standard Scheme (MLSS) in China's 31 capital cities. It was found that local officials not only assess applicants’ assets and incomes, but also their living space, quality of home decoration, possession of luxury goods, leisure activities, and behavior. The local governments’ use of a lifestyle assessment approach is caused by financial constraints and the lack of an effective mechanism to check applicants’ incomes. The lifestyle approach leads to regional inequalities in accessing public assistance, because some of the terms, which define the quality of life, are too ambiguous. The lifestyle approach, which requires applicants to live in very poor living conditions and also demonstrate their hardship to local officials, will be a barrier preventing poor people from being integrated into their communities. This study suggests that the key words and terms in the policy documents need to be clearly explained and similar criteria should also be adopted across different regions. It also proposes that the gap between MLSS eligibility criteria in the policy papers and their actual implementation requires further study in order to understand the impact of special local factors and the quality of life of poor people in China.

KW - Eligibility criteria

KW - fiscal disparities

KW - inequality

KW - lifestyle assessment approach

KW - social exclusion

KW - stigmatization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048867358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7568

U2 - 10.1080/01488376.2018.1476294

DO - 10.1080/01488376.2018.1476294

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 44

SP - 437

EP - 447

JO - Journal of Social Service Research

JF - Journal of Social Service Research

SN - 0148-8376

IS - 4

ER -