Public attitude towards militant protest in Hong Kong: An investigation based on the elaborated social identity model

Yue Feng Alex ZHU*, Kee Lee CHOU

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Group-based norms regarding political participation are not static; they are malleable attributes affected by police–protest dynamics in the social movement context. This study used a comprehensive and authoritative sampling framework to collect the views of Hong Kong residents at the end of the anti-extradition bill movement (n = 1,000; 53.6% female; mean age = 46.4, range 18–86) and evaluated them using the Elaborated Social Identity Model. The results revealed a full mediational pathway from police action perceived as indiscriminate that facilitated the public’s identification with the militant protesters and bolstered public support for the militant protest. Our findings provide an in-depth understanding of why the public supported violent protest and criminal vandalism in the movement by adopting the interactive arena between police and protesters as the entry point and the development of shared identity as the process. Our findings highlight crowd management as a complex issue in relational dynamics rather than a purely logistical challenge.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberpaab073
Pages (from-to)188-203
Number of pages16
JournalPolicing: A Journal of Policy and Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date20 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by grants from Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office Public Policy Research (PPR) Funding Scheme (Special Round), Hong Kong SAR (Project Number SR2020.A5.028, Principle Investigator: Prof. Kee Lee Chou).

Publisher Copyright:
VC The Author(s) 2021.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public attitude towards militant protest in Hong Kong: An investigation based on the elaborated social identity model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this