Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy

Richard M. WALKER*, George A. BOYNE

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

162 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present the first empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's program of public management reform. This reform program is based on rational planning, devolution and delegation, flexibility and incentives, and enhanced choice. Measures of these variables are tested against external and internal indicators of organizational performance. The setting for the study is upper tier English local governments, and data are drawn from a multiple informant survey of 117 authorities. The statistical results indicate that planning, organizational flexibility, and user choice are associated with higher performance. Conclusions are drawn for the theory and practice of public management reform. © 2006 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-393
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Policy Analysis and Management
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the ESRC/EPSRC Advanced Institute of Management Research under grant numbers 331-25-0006 and 331-25-0004, respectively; the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (England), who funded the research that this paper is based on; faculty at Georgia State University (Department of Public Administration and Urban Studies) and the University of Georgia at Athens (Department of Public Administration and Policy) for their valuable comments; and the JPAM referees. Interpretation of results rests with the authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this