Qualitative comparative analysis and applied public policy analysis : new applications of innovative methods

John HUDSON, Stefan KÜHNER

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

QCA based methods have grown in popularity in recent years. Standing between quantitative and qualitative research, in principle they help balance the breadth of analysis provided by quantitative data with the depth of case study knowledge provided by qualitative analysis. The challenge of mixing depth and breadth has always been a particularly acute one for policy based research. Proponents of QCA techniques suggest they are better placed to handle the diversity of policy provision found in different spatial entities than standard linear quantitative methods, while also able to allow for hypothesis testing based upon a fine grained analysis that is more systematic in approach than the techniques typically employed in standard qualitative analyses. The full potential of these methods for policy analysis has yet to be realised however. Partly this is because knowledge of these methods remains at the margins of the policy analysis community, particularly amongst practitioners undertaking applied policy analyses such as policy evaluations. In the introduction to this volume we first outline some of the key principles of QCA research before moving on to identify some of its key advantages. We round off by highlighting key themes explored by the papers included within the volume.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-287
Number of pages9
JournalPolicy and Society
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public policy
hypothesis testing
quantitative research
quantitative method
popularity
qualitative research
evaluation
community

Cite this

@article{2eff8932e93642a5896040e714a312d5,
title = "Qualitative comparative analysis and applied public policy analysis : new applications of innovative methods",
abstract = "QCA based methods have grown in popularity in recent years. Standing between quantitative and qualitative research, in principle they help balance the breadth of analysis provided by quantitative data with the depth of case study knowledge provided by qualitative analysis. The challenge of mixing depth and breadth has always been a particularly acute one for policy based research. Proponents of QCA techniques suggest they are better placed to handle the diversity of policy provision found in different spatial entities than standard linear quantitative methods, while also able to allow for hypothesis testing based upon a fine grained analysis that is more systematic in approach than the techniques typically employed in standard qualitative analyses. The full potential of these methods for policy analysis has yet to be realised however. Partly this is because knowledge of these methods remains at the margins of the policy analysis community, particularly amongst practitioners undertaking applied policy analyses such as policy evaluations. In the introduction to this volume we first outline some of the key principles of QCA research before moving on to identify some of its key advantages. We round off by highlighting key themes explored by the papers included within the volume.",
author = "John HUDSON and Stefan K{\"U}HNER",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "279--287",
journal = "Policy and Society",
issn = "1449-4035",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Qualitative comparative analysis and applied public policy analysis : new applications of innovative methods. / HUDSON, John; KÜHNER, Stefan.

In: Policy and Society, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2013, p. 279-287.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative comparative analysis and applied public policy analysis : new applications of innovative methods

AU - HUDSON, John

AU - KÜHNER, Stefan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - QCA based methods have grown in popularity in recent years. Standing between quantitative and qualitative research, in principle they help balance the breadth of analysis provided by quantitative data with the depth of case study knowledge provided by qualitative analysis. The challenge of mixing depth and breadth has always been a particularly acute one for policy based research. Proponents of QCA techniques suggest they are better placed to handle the diversity of policy provision found in different spatial entities than standard linear quantitative methods, while also able to allow for hypothesis testing based upon a fine grained analysis that is more systematic in approach than the techniques typically employed in standard qualitative analyses. The full potential of these methods for policy analysis has yet to be realised however. Partly this is because knowledge of these methods remains at the margins of the policy analysis community, particularly amongst practitioners undertaking applied policy analyses such as policy evaluations. In the introduction to this volume we first outline some of the key principles of QCA research before moving on to identify some of its key advantages. We round off by highlighting key themes explored by the papers included within the volume.

AB - QCA based methods have grown in popularity in recent years. Standing between quantitative and qualitative research, in principle they help balance the breadth of analysis provided by quantitative data with the depth of case study knowledge provided by qualitative analysis. The challenge of mixing depth and breadth has always been a particularly acute one for policy based research. Proponents of QCA techniques suggest they are better placed to handle the diversity of policy provision found in different spatial entities than standard linear quantitative methods, while also able to allow for hypothesis testing based upon a fine grained analysis that is more systematic in approach than the techniques typically employed in standard qualitative analyses. The full potential of these methods for policy analysis has yet to be realised however. Partly this is because knowledge of these methods remains at the margins of the policy analysis community, particularly amongst practitioners undertaking applied policy analyses such as policy evaluations. In the introduction to this volume we first outline some of the key principles of QCA research before moving on to identify some of its key advantages. We round off by highlighting key themes explored by the papers included within the volume.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4770

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888435320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.001

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 32

SP - 279

EP - 287

JO - Policy and Society

JF - Policy and Society

SN - 1449-4035

IS - 4

ER -