Questions for cultural politics

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

At a recent panel discussion on English Studies today, a question was raised regarding the much-discussed crisis in the discipline and for whom it indeed was a crisis. From the responses of students and some junior faculty, it could be seen that it was certainly not a crisis for them, or rather that it was not how they would name, from their perspective, the palpable disturbance in English Literature departments which they were instrumental in fomenting. Where was the crisis when questions were clearly being opened up rather than foreclosed? "Crisis" is not a description proposed by the established interests in English either, since they are adamant in the belief that nothing has changed and all aberrations will be taken care of. What is happening, then, is a persistent naming of a situation for those refusing to acknowledge it, by those who have something at stake in aggravating it. The naming is intended to "implicate", to investigate whose crisis it is anyway, to demand a recognition that indeed it cannot be business as usual any more.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSubject to change : teaching literature in the nineties
PublisherOrient Longman
Pages125-133
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9788125013457
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cultural Politics
Naming
Panel Discussion
English Literature
Names
English Studies

Cite this

NIRANJANA, T. (1998). Questions for cultural politics. In Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties (pp. 125-133). Orient Longman.
NIRANJANA, Tejaswini. / Questions for cultural politics. Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties. Orient Longman, 1998. pp. 125-133
@inbook{6c53ae4491d747868ad139ec070ef16e,
title = "Questions for cultural politics",
abstract = "At a recent panel discussion on English Studies today, a question was raised regarding the much-discussed crisis in the discipline and for whom it indeed was a crisis. From the responses of students and some junior faculty, it could be seen that it was certainly not a crisis for them, or rather that it was not how they would name, from their perspective, the palpable disturbance in English Literature departments which they were instrumental in fomenting. Where was the crisis when questions were clearly being opened up rather than foreclosed? {"}Crisis{"} is not a description proposed by the established interests in English either, since they are adamant in the belief that nothing has changed and all aberrations will be taken care of. What is happening, then, is a persistent naming of a situation for those refusing to acknowledge it, by those who have something at stake in aggravating it. The naming is intended to {"}implicate{"}, to investigate whose crisis it is anyway, to demand a recognition that indeed it cannot be business as usual any more.",
author = "Tejaswini NIRANJANA",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788125013457",
pages = "125--133",
booktitle = "Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties",
publisher = "Orient Longman",

}

NIRANJANA, T 1998, Questions for cultural politics. in Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties. Orient Longman, pp. 125-133.

Questions for cultural politics. / NIRANJANA, Tejaswini.

Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties. Orient Longman, 1998. p. 125-133.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Questions for cultural politics

AU - NIRANJANA, Tejaswini

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - At a recent panel discussion on English Studies today, a question was raised regarding the much-discussed crisis in the discipline and for whom it indeed was a crisis. From the responses of students and some junior faculty, it could be seen that it was certainly not a crisis for them, or rather that it was not how they would name, from their perspective, the palpable disturbance in English Literature departments which they were instrumental in fomenting. Where was the crisis when questions were clearly being opened up rather than foreclosed? "Crisis" is not a description proposed by the established interests in English either, since they are adamant in the belief that nothing has changed and all aberrations will be taken care of. What is happening, then, is a persistent naming of a situation for those refusing to acknowledge it, by those who have something at stake in aggravating it. The naming is intended to "implicate", to investigate whose crisis it is anyway, to demand a recognition that indeed it cannot be business as usual any more.

AB - At a recent panel discussion on English Studies today, a question was raised regarding the much-discussed crisis in the discipline and for whom it indeed was a crisis. From the responses of students and some junior faculty, it could be seen that it was certainly not a crisis for them, or rather that it was not how they would name, from their perspective, the palpable disturbance in English Literature departments which they were instrumental in fomenting. Where was the crisis when questions were clearly being opened up rather than foreclosed? "Crisis" is not a description proposed by the established interests in English either, since they are adamant in the belief that nothing has changed and all aberrations will be taken care of. What is happening, then, is a persistent naming of a situation for those refusing to acknowledge it, by those who have something at stake in aggravating it. The naming is intended to "implicate", to investigate whose crisis it is anyway, to demand a recognition that indeed it cannot be business as usual any more.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4723

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9788125013457

SP - 125

EP - 133

BT - Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties

PB - Orient Longman

ER -

NIRANJANA T. Questions for cultural politics. In Subject to change : teaching literature in the nineties. Orient Longman. 1998. p. 125-133