Race : a social destruction of a biological concept

Neven SESARDIC

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines (anthropology, genetics, psychology, philosophy of science) that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense. My aim is to challenge the arguments that are usually thought to invalidate the biological concept of race. I will try to show that the way ‘‘race’’ was defined by biologists several decades ago (by Dobzhansky and others) is in no way discredited by conceptual criticisms that are now fashionable and widely regarded as cogent. These criticisms often arbitrarily burden the biological category of race with some implausible connotations, which then opens the path for a quick eliminative move. However, when properly understood, the biological notion of race proves remarkably resistant to these deconstructive attempts. Moreover, by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race, I hope to demonstrate that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-162
Number of pages20
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

anthropology
Anthropology
psychology
Medical Genetics
biologists
Destruction
Psychology
taxonomy
genetic variation
Criticism
Theodosius Dobzhansky
Genetic Psychology
Burden
Social Constructivism
Taxonomy
Philosophy of Science
Human Race
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Genetics
  • Geographical ancestry
  • Human variation
  • Philosophy of science
  • Race
  • Social constructivism

Cite this

SESARDIC, Neven. / Race : a social destruction of a biological concept. In: Biology and Philosophy. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 143-162.
@article{e0c35880b6bc4406a66a72d99903ea5a,
title = "Race : a social destruction of a biological concept",
abstract = "It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines (anthropology, genetics, psychology, philosophy of science) that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense. My aim is to challenge the arguments that are usually thought to invalidate the biological concept of race. I will try to show that the way ‘‘race’’ was defined by biologists several decades ago (by Dobzhansky and others) is in no way discredited by conceptual criticisms that are now fashionable and widely regarded as cogent. These criticisms often arbitrarily burden the biological category of race with some implausible connotations, which then opens the path for a quick eliminative move. However, when properly understood, the biological notion of race proves remarkably resistant to these deconstructive attempts. Moreover, by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race, I hope to demonstrate that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.",
keywords = "Genetics, Geographical ancestry, Human variation, Philosophy of science, Race, Social constructivism",
author = "Neven SESARDIC",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10539-009-9193-7",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "143--162",
journal = "Biology and Philosophy",
issn = "0169-3867",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Race : a social destruction of a biological concept. / SESARDIC, Neven.

In: Biology and Philosophy, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.03.2010, p. 143-162.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race : a social destruction of a biological concept

AU - SESARDIC, Neven

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines (anthropology, genetics, psychology, philosophy of science) that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense. My aim is to challenge the arguments that are usually thought to invalidate the biological concept of race. I will try to show that the way ‘‘race’’ was defined by biologists several decades ago (by Dobzhansky and others) is in no way discredited by conceptual criticisms that are now fashionable and widely regarded as cogent. These criticisms often arbitrarily burden the biological category of race with some implausible connotations, which then opens the path for a quick eliminative move. However, when properly understood, the biological notion of race proves remarkably resistant to these deconstructive attempts. Moreover, by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race, I hope to demonstrate that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.

AB - It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines (anthropology, genetics, psychology, philosophy of science) that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense. My aim is to challenge the arguments that are usually thought to invalidate the biological concept of race. I will try to show that the way ‘‘race’’ was defined by biologists several decades ago (by Dobzhansky and others) is in no way discredited by conceptual criticisms that are now fashionable and widely regarded as cogent. These criticisms often arbitrarily burden the biological category of race with some implausible connotations, which then opens the path for a quick eliminative move. However, when properly understood, the biological notion of race proves remarkably resistant to these deconstructive attempts. Moreover, by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race, I hope to demonstrate that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.

KW - Genetics

KW - Geographical ancestry

KW - Human variation

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Race

KW - Social constructivism

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/715

U2 - 10.1007/s10539-009-9193-7

DO - 10.1007/s10539-009-9193-7

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 25

SP - 143

EP - 162

JO - Biology and Philosophy

JF - Biology and Philosophy

SN - 0169-3867

IS - 2

ER -