Reader response and reception theory

Leo Tak-hung Chan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the discipline of Translation Studies was semi-officially inaugurated three decades ago with the publication of James Holmes' well-known essay, “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies’’,there have been surprisingly few studies conducted on the reading of translations, other than those of an evaluative nature done in the name of translation criticism. But just as the audience has recently come to occupy a pivotal position in communication studies, so too the real or historical reader is garnering increasing attention in Translation Studies. This reader should not be confused with the “addressee” (at whom the translation is targeted) or the translator-as-reader (who first reads the text before doing a translation). Indeed, much has been written about how translators can better serve the target addressees, i.e., readers, in the translator- oriented research that has long been dominant in the field. Text- oriented research, which constructs an image of the reader from the text, has also received a good deal of attention. The recent profusion of research on reader response and audience response in literary and cultural studios, however, has produced new methodologies and terminologies, which, when transferred to translation research, open up new possibilities for the study of the real, rather than the imagined, reader.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearching translation and interpreting
EditorsClaudia V. ANGELELLI, Brian James BAER
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
Chapter11
Pages146-154
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781317479383
ISBN (Print)9780415732536, 9780415732543
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

translator
Reception Theory
Reader Response
Reader
technical language
criticism
Translator
communication
methodology
Translation Studies
Addressee
Nature
Criticism
Names
Methodology
Communication Studies

Cite this

Chan, L. T. (2016). Reader response and reception theory. In C. V. ANGELELLI, & B. J. BAER (Eds.), Researching translation and interpreting (pp. 146-154). London: Taylor and Francis Inc..
Chan, Leo Tak-hung. / Reader response and reception theory. Researching translation and interpreting. editor / Claudia V. ANGELELLI ; Brian James BAER. London : Taylor and Francis Inc., 2016. pp. 146-154
@inbook{b5ef8039c3fd4bec9554d3045519b6b3,
title = "Reader response and reception theory",
abstract = "Since the discipline of Translation Studies was semi-officially inaugurated three decades ago with the publication of James Holmes' well-known essay, “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies’’,there have been surprisingly few studies conducted on the reading of translations, other than those of an evaluative nature done in the name of translation criticism. But just as the audience has recently come to occupy a pivotal position in communication studies, so too the real or historical reader is garnering increasing attention in Translation Studies. This reader should not be confused with the “addressee” (at whom the translation is targeted) or the translator-as-reader (who first reads the text before doing a translation). Indeed, much has been written about how translators can better serve the target addressees, i.e., readers, in the translator- oriented research that has long been dominant in the field. Text- oriented research, which constructs an image of the reader from the text, has also received a good deal of attention. The recent profusion of research on reader response and audience response in literary and cultural studios, however, has produced new methodologies and terminologies, which, when transferred to translation research, open up new possibilities for the study of the real, rather than the imagined, reader.",
author = "Chan, {Leo Tak-hung}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415732536",
pages = "146--154",
editor = "ANGELELLI, {Claudia V.} and BAER, {Brian James}",
booktitle = "Researching translation and interpreting",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

Chan, LT 2016, Reader response and reception theory. in CV ANGELELLI & BJ BAER (eds), Researching translation and interpreting. Taylor and Francis Inc., London, pp. 146-154.

Reader response and reception theory. / Chan, Leo Tak-hung.

Researching translation and interpreting. ed. / Claudia V. ANGELELLI; Brian James BAER. London : Taylor and Francis Inc., 2016. p. 146-154.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Reader response and reception theory

AU - Chan, Leo Tak-hung

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Since the discipline of Translation Studies was semi-officially inaugurated three decades ago with the publication of James Holmes' well-known essay, “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies’’,there have been surprisingly few studies conducted on the reading of translations, other than those of an evaluative nature done in the name of translation criticism. But just as the audience has recently come to occupy a pivotal position in communication studies, so too the real or historical reader is garnering increasing attention in Translation Studies. This reader should not be confused with the “addressee” (at whom the translation is targeted) or the translator-as-reader (who first reads the text before doing a translation). Indeed, much has been written about how translators can better serve the target addressees, i.e., readers, in the translator- oriented research that has long been dominant in the field. Text- oriented research, which constructs an image of the reader from the text, has also received a good deal of attention. The recent profusion of research on reader response and audience response in literary and cultural studios, however, has produced new methodologies and terminologies, which, when transferred to translation research, open up new possibilities for the study of the real, rather than the imagined, reader.

AB - Since the discipline of Translation Studies was semi-officially inaugurated three decades ago with the publication of James Holmes' well-known essay, “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies’’,there have been surprisingly few studies conducted on the reading of translations, other than those of an evaluative nature done in the name of translation criticism. But just as the audience has recently come to occupy a pivotal position in communication studies, so too the real or historical reader is garnering increasing attention in Translation Studies. This reader should not be confused with the “addressee” (at whom the translation is targeted) or the translator-as-reader (who first reads the text before doing a translation). Indeed, much has been written about how translators can better serve the target addressees, i.e., readers, in the translator- oriented research that has long been dominant in the field. Text- oriented research, which constructs an image of the reader from the text, has also received a good deal of attention. The recent profusion of research on reader response and audience response in literary and cultural studios, however, has produced new methodologies and terminologies, which, when transferred to translation research, open up new possibilities for the study of the real, rather than the imagined, reader.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941625378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4532

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780415732536

SN - 9780415732543

SP - 146

EP - 154

BT - Researching translation and interpreting

A2 - ANGELELLI, Claudia V.

A2 - BAER, Brian James

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

CY - London

ER -

Chan LT. Reader response and reception theory. In ANGELELLI CV, BAER BJ, editors, Researching translation and interpreting. London: Taylor and Francis Inc. 2016. p. 146-154