Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction

Ann BLANDFORD, Jonathan BACK, Paul CURZON, Yau Wai, Simon LI, Rimvydas RUKSENAS

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we focus on system resilience from the perspective of understanding human error. In particular, we consider systematic cognitive slips, including post-completion errors, which are persistent, though infrequent. We outline the findings from empirical studies that have identified various factors that provoke or mitigate against such errors. We then describe approaches we are pursuing to encapsulate these insights in ways that can be re-used within system design. More broadly, we argue that an understanding of the factors that influence the likelihood of such errors can support organizations in designing systems and processes to minimize the likelihood of such errors.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium
Publisherles presses
Pages36-43
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9782911762772
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Systems analysis

Cite this

BLANDFORD, A., BACK, J., CURZON, P., LI, Y. W. S., & RUKSENAS, R. (2006). Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. In Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium (pp. 36-43). les presses.
BLANDFORD, Ann ; BACK, Jonathan ; CURZON, Paul ; LI, Yau Wai, Simon ; RUKSENAS, Rimvydas. / Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium. les presses, 2006. pp. 36-43
@inproceedings{175f3ea5b02c40d48841958bdeccabbb,
title = "Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction",
abstract = "In this paper we focus on system resilience from the perspective of understanding human error. In particular, we consider systematic cognitive slips, including post-completion errors, which are persistent, though infrequent. We outline the findings from empirical studies that have identified various factors that provoke or mitigate against such errors. We then describe approaches we are pursuing to encapsulate these insights in ways that can be re-used within system design. More broadly, we argue that an understanding of the factors that influence the likelihood of such errors can support organizations in designing systems and processes to minimize the likelihood of such errors.",
author = "Ann BLANDFORD and Jonathan BACK and Paul CURZON and LI, {Yau Wai, Simon} and Rimvydas RUKSENAS",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9782911762772",
pages = "36--43",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium",
publisher = "les presses",

}

BLANDFORD, A, BACK, J, CURZON, P, LI, YWS & RUKSENAS, R 2006, Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. in Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium. les presses, pp. 36-43.

Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. / BLANDFORD, Ann; BACK, Jonathan; CURZON, Paul; LI, Yau Wai, Simon; RUKSENAS, Rimvydas.

Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium. les presses, 2006. p. 36-43.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction

AU - BLANDFORD, Ann

AU - BACK, Jonathan

AU - CURZON, Paul

AU - LI, Yau Wai, Simon

AU - RUKSENAS, Rimvydas

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In this paper we focus on system resilience from the perspective of understanding human error. In particular, we consider systematic cognitive slips, including post-completion errors, which are persistent, though infrequent. We outline the findings from empirical studies that have identified various factors that provoke or mitigate against such errors. We then describe approaches we are pursuing to encapsulate these insights in ways that can be re-used within system design. More broadly, we argue that an understanding of the factors that influence the likelihood of such errors can support organizations in designing systems and processes to minimize the likelihood of such errors.

AB - In this paper we focus on system resilience from the perspective of understanding human error. In particular, we consider systematic cognitive slips, including post-completion errors, which are persistent, though infrequent. We outline the findings from empirical studies that have identified various factors that provoke or mitigate against such errors. We then describe approaches we are pursuing to encapsulate these insights in ways that can be re-used within system design. More broadly, we argue that an understanding of the factors that influence the likelihood of such errors can support organizations in designing systems and processes to minimize the likelihood of such errors.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2633

M3 - Conference paper (refereed)

SN - 9782911762772

SP - 36

EP - 43

BT - Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium

PB - les presses

ER -

BLANDFORD A, BACK J, CURZON P, LI YWS, RUKSENAS R. Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. In Proceedings of the second resilience engineering symposium. les presses. 2006. p. 36-43