Red or expert? The Anglo–Soviet exchange of ambassadors in 1929

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

Throughout the 1920s, distrust and contention marked Anglo–Soviet relations, culminating in the diplomatic break in 1927. In 1929, the incoming Labour government successfully pursued its objective of re-establishing diplomatic relations with Moscow, but the follow-up in terms of ambassadorial appointments was far from routine for either side. This analysis shows that internal pressures complicated decisions about whether to appoint career diplomats or choose political figures. Resisting both claims from enthusiastically hopeful Labour backbenchers and criticisms from the left wing media, the British foreign secretary, Arthur Henderson, chose a Russian-speaking career diplomat. On the Soviet side, the first choice was a controversial politician, but then replaced by a financial expert, albeit one tainted as a defeated political opponent of Josef Stalin. Whilst both ambassadors could be considered “professionals,” neither was able to have a deep impact on the relationship, which remained troubled.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-452
Number of pages16
JournalDiplomacy and Statecraft
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

diplomat
expert
career
labor
diplomatic relations
politician
speaking
criticism
Diplomats
Ambassadors
Labour Government
Foreign Secretary
Opponents
1920s
Moscow
Labor
Political Figures
Politicians
Criticism

Cite this

@article{740f5b6da0e246e987cf320b7139dbf8,
title = "Red or expert? The Anglo–Soviet exchange of ambassadors in 1929",
abstract = "Throughout the 1920s, distrust and contention marked Anglo–Soviet relations, culminating in the diplomatic break in 1927. In 1929, the incoming Labour government successfully pursued its objective of re-establishing diplomatic relations with Moscow, but the follow-up in terms of ambassadorial appointments was far from routine for either side. This analysis shows that internal pressures complicated decisions about whether to appoint career diplomats or choose political figures. Resisting both claims from enthusiastically hopeful Labour backbenchers and criticisms from the left wing media, the British foreign secretary, Arthur Henderson, chose a Russian-speaking career diplomat. On the Soviet side, the first choice was a controversial politician, but then replaced by a financial expert, albeit one tainted as a defeated political opponent of Josef Stalin. Whilst both ambassadors could be considered “professionals,” neither was able to have a deep impact on the relationship, which remained troubled.",
author = "Brian BRIDGES",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09592296.2016.1196065",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "437--452",
journal = "Diplomacy and Statecraft",
issn = "0959-2296",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Red or expert? The Anglo–Soviet exchange of ambassadors in 1929. / BRIDGES, Brian.

In: Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.2016, p. 437-452.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Red or expert? The Anglo–Soviet exchange of ambassadors in 1929

AU - BRIDGES, Brian

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Throughout the 1920s, distrust and contention marked Anglo–Soviet relations, culminating in the diplomatic break in 1927. In 1929, the incoming Labour government successfully pursued its objective of re-establishing diplomatic relations with Moscow, but the follow-up in terms of ambassadorial appointments was far from routine for either side. This analysis shows that internal pressures complicated decisions about whether to appoint career diplomats or choose political figures. Resisting both claims from enthusiastically hopeful Labour backbenchers and criticisms from the left wing media, the British foreign secretary, Arthur Henderson, chose a Russian-speaking career diplomat. On the Soviet side, the first choice was a controversial politician, but then replaced by a financial expert, albeit one tainted as a defeated political opponent of Josef Stalin. Whilst both ambassadors could be considered “professionals,” neither was able to have a deep impact on the relationship, which remained troubled.

AB - Throughout the 1920s, distrust and contention marked Anglo–Soviet relations, culminating in the diplomatic break in 1927. In 1929, the incoming Labour government successfully pursued its objective of re-establishing diplomatic relations with Moscow, but the follow-up in terms of ambassadorial appointments was far from routine for either side. This analysis shows that internal pressures complicated decisions about whether to appoint career diplomats or choose political figures. Resisting both claims from enthusiastically hopeful Labour backbenchers and criticisms from the left wing media, the British foreign secretary, Arthur Henderson, chose a Russian-speaking career diplomat. On the Soviet side, the first choice was a controversial politician, but then replaced by a financial expert, albeit one tainted as a defeated political opponent of Josef Stalin. Whilst both ambassadors could be considered “professionals,” neither was able to have a deep impact on the relationship, which remained troubled.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5439

U2 - 10.1080/09592296.2016.1196065

DO - 10.1080/09592296.2016.1196065

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 27

SP - 437

EP - 452

JO - Diplomacy and Statecraft

JF - Diplomacy and Statecraft

SN - 0959-2296

IS - 3

ER -