Reflecting on reviewing : applying conflict management research

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviewing manuscripts is vital for developing knowledge and promoting the capabilities of researchers. This article uses conflict management research to examine the opportunities and obstacles in making reviewing constructive for the field and for individual researchers. Although dissensus has been thought to reflect how individual biases and organizational dynamics frustrate reviewing, research suggests that when, discussed open-mindedly, conflicts can stimulate effective reviewing. Research on open-mindedness provides guidance for how researchers, editors, and referees can voice their conflicts and integrate their ideas to make high quality decisions and learn. However, current practices make it challenging to manage conflict openly and constructively. Fostering open-minded discussion among researchers, editors, and referees could be an important component in making traditional and new forms of reviewing effective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1079-1092
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume35
Issue number8
Early online date17 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Fingerprint

conflict management
Research Personnel
referee
Research
editor
Foster Home Care
Manuscripts
Reviewing
Management research
Conflict management
trend
Referees

Keywords

  • Conflict management
  • Dissensus
  • Open-mindedness
  • Reviewing

Cite this

@article{96426a0f079a40d8bc86d7e53ec02741,
title = "Reflecting on reviewing : applying conflict management research",
abstract = "Reviewing manuscripts is vital for developing knowledge and promoting the capabilities of researchers. This article uses conflict management research to examine the opportunities and obstacles in making reviewing constructive for the field and for individual researchers. Although dissensus has been thought to reflect how individual biases and organizational dynamics frustrate reviewing, research suggests that when, discussed open-mindedly, conflicts can stimulate effective reviewing. Research on open-mindedness provides guidance for how researchers, editors, and referees can voice their conflicts and integrate their ideas to make high quality decisions and learn. However, current practices make it challenging to manage conflict openly and constructively. Fostering open-minded discussion among researchers, editors, and referees could be an important component in making traditional and new forms of reviewing effective.",
keywords = "Conflict management, Dissensus, Open-mindedness, Reviewing",
author = "Dean TJOSVOLD",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/job.1964",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1079--1092",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

Reflecting on reviewing : applying conflict management research. / TJOSVOLD, Dean .

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 8, 11.2014, p. 1079-1092.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflecting on reviewing : applying conflict management research

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Reviewing manuscripts is vital for developing knowledge and promoting the capabilities of researchers. This article uses conflict management research to examine the opportunities and obstacles in making reviewing constructive for the field and for individual researchers. Although dissensus has been thought to reflect how individual biases and organizational dynamics frustrate reviewing, research suggests that when, discussed open-mindedly, conflicts can stimulate effective reviewing. Research on open-mindedness provides guidance for how researchers, editors, and referees can voice their conflicts and integrate their ideas to make high quality decisions and learn. However, current practices make it challenging to manage conflict openly and constructively. Fostering open-minded discussion among researchers, editors, and referees could be an important component in making traditional and new forms of reviewing effective.

AB - Reviewing manuscripts is vital for developing knowledge and promoting the capabilities of researchers. This article uses conflict management research to examine the opportunities and obstacles in making reviewing constructive for the field and for individual researchers. Although dissensus has been thought to reflect how individual biases and organizational dynamics frustrate reviewing, research suggests that when, discussed open-mindedly, conflicts can stimulate effective reviewing. Research on open-mindedness provides guidance for how researchers, editors, and referees can voice their conflicts and integrate their ideas to make high quality decisions and learn. However, current practices make it challenging to manage conflict openly and constructively. Fostering open-minded discussion among researchers, editors, and referees could be an important component in making traditional and new forms of reviewing effective.

KW - Conflict management

KW - Dissensus

KW - Open-mindedness

KW - Reviewing

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2377

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84910608564&doi=10.1002%2fjob.1964&partnerID=40&md5=e9313aa37130a8220866f644abfca2a9

U2 - 10.1002/job.1964

DO - 10.1002/job.1964

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 35

SP - 1079

EP - 1092

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

IS - 8

ER -