Regulation, innovation, and firm selection : the porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition

Larry D. QIU, Mohan ZHOU, Xu WEI

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Porter Hypothesis (PH) posits that well-designed environmental regulations can stimulate innovation, which may lead to efficiency gains or even profit increase in regulated firms. In this study, we revisit the PH under monopolistic competition by incorporating two important features in our model and analysis, namely, firm heterogeneity and general equilibrium. We show that the PH holds for high-capability firms, but not for low-capability firms. Heterogeneous responses exist in innovation investment, but the average industry productivity increases. We obtain an interesting finding that adds a new feature to the PH. This finding indicates that strict environmental regulations can encourage firm entry and exit, thereby improving the composition of firms in the regulated industry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)638-658
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume92
Early online date23 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

innovation
industry
firm
regulation
Innovation
Porter hypothesis
Monopolistic competition
productivity
Environmental regulation
Firm capabilities

Bibliographical note

Paper presented in the 9th Biennial Conference of the Hong Kong Economic Association (2016 in Hong Kong)and the 15th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference (2017 in Boston).

Keywords

  • Pollution
  • Heterogeneous firms
  • Environmental regulations
  • Porter Hypothesis
  • Monopolistic competition

Cite this

@article{7627f6710b9848b1a18d18e645e2ff3f,
title = "Regulation, innovation, and firm selection : the porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition",
abstract = "The Porter Hypothesis (PH) posits that well-designed environmental regulations can stimulate innovation, which may lead to efficiency gains or even profit increase in regulated firms. In this study, we revisit the PH under monopolistic competition by incorporating two important features in our model and analysis, namely, firm heterogeneity and general equilibrium. We show that the PH holds for high-capability firms, but not for low-capability firms. Heterogeneous responses exist in innovation investment, but the average industry productivity increases. We obtain an interesting finding that adds a new feature to the PH. This finding indicates that strict environmental regulations can encourage firm entry and exit, thereby improving the composition of firms in the regulated industry.",
keywords = "Pollution, Heterogeneous firms, Environmental regulations, Porter Hypothesis, Monopolistic competition",
author = "QIU, {Larry D.} and Mohan ZHOU and Xu WEI",
note = "Paper presented in the 9th Biennial Conference of the Hong Kong Economic Association (2016 in Hong Kong)and the 15th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference (2017 in Boston).",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.012",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "638--658",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Regulation, innovation, and firm selection : the porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition. / QIU, Larry D.; ZHOU, Mohan; WEI, Xu.

In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 92, 11.2018, p. 638-658.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulation, innovation, and firm selection : the porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition

AU - QIU, Larry D.

AU - ZHOU, Mohan

AU - WEI, Xu

N1 - Paper presented in the 9th Biennial Conference of the Hong Kong Economic Association (2016 in Hong Kong)and the 15th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference (2017 in Boston).

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - The Porter Hypothesis (PH) posits that well-designed environmental regulations can stimulate innovation, which may lead to efficiency gains or even profit increase in regulated firms. In this study, we revisit the PH under monopolistic competition by incorporating two important features in our model and analysis, namely, firm heterogeneity and general equilibrium. We show that the PH holds for high-capability firms, but not for low-capability firms. Heterogeneous responses exist in innovation investment, but the average industry productivity increases. We obtain an interesting finding that adds a new feature to the PH. This finding indicates that strict environmental regulations can encourage firm entry and exit, thereby improving the composition of firms in the regulated industry.

AB - The Porter Hypothesis (PH) posits that well-designed environmental regulations can stimulate innovation, which may lead to efficiency gains or even profit increase in regulated firms. In this study, we revisit the PH under monopolistic competition by incorporating two important features in our model and analysis, namely, firm heterogeneity and general equilibrium. We show that the PH holds for high-capability firms, but not for low-capability firms. Heterogeneous responses exist in innovation investment, but the average industry productivity increases. We obtain an interesting finding that adds a new feature to the PH. This finding indicates that strict environmental regulations can encourage firm entry and exit, thereby improving the composition of firms in the regulated industry.

KW - Pollution

KW - Heterogeneous firms

KW - Environmental regulations

KW - Porter Hypothesis

KW - Monopolistic competition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031769749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.012

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 92

SP - 638

EP - 658

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

ER -