Reinterpreting the rule of law in Hong Kong

James RICE

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

This paper argues that since the return to Chinese rule in July 1997, the actions of Hong Kong authorities have evidenced a disregard for their obligations under international covenants, as well as for judicial independence. What the administration has referred to as a ‘new constitutional order’ has in fact been a reassertion of this same patriarchal order and a further retreat from the rule of law. An independent judiciary is gradually being replaced by a regime in which the ‘true legislative intent’ of law is ultimately determined by the Hong Kong Government and the National People’s Congress. This shift is alarming because the previous colonial administration failed to put into place institutions such as a democratically constituted legislature. Instead, it placed great emphasis on the judiciary as the default institution for delivering both accountability and transparency in Government. That matter in which the post-hand over judiciary was initially tested involved not a commercial dispute, but the matter of a right of abode, which demonstrates a perpetuation of this patriarchal rule.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-76
Number of pages37
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

judiciary
constitutional state
Hong Kong
transparency
obligation
regime
responsibility
Law

Cite this

@article{f8e7e646f7a84102a852fbfbcb76246e,
title = "Reinterpreting the rule of law in Hong Kong",
abstract = "This paper argues that since the return to Chinese rule in July 1997, the actions of Hong Kong authorities have evidenced a disregard for their obligations under international covenants, as well as for judicial independence. What the administration has referred to as a ‘new constitutional order’ has in fact been a reassertion of this same patriarchal order and a further retreat from the rule of law. An independent judiciary is gradually being replaced by a regime in which the ‘true legislative intent’ of law is ultimately determined by the Hong Kong Government and the National People’s Congress. This shift is alarming because the previous colonial administration failed to put into place institutions such as a democratically constituted legislature. Instead, it placed great emphasis on the judiciary as the default institution for delivering both accountability and transparency in Government. That matter in which the post-hand over judiciary was initially tested involved not a commercial dispute, but the matter of a right of abode, which demonstrates a perpetuation of this patriarchal rule.",
author = "James RICE",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1163/157181502761418120",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "40--76",
journal = "Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law",
issn = "1388-1906",
publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Reinterpreting the rule of law in Hong Kong. / RICE, James.

In: Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2002, p. 40-76.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reinterpreting the rule of law in Hong Kong

AU - RICE, James

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper argues that since the return to Chinese rule in July 1997, the actions of Hong Kong authorities have evidenced a disregard for their obligations under international covenants, as well as for judicial independence. What the administration has referred to as a ‘new constitutional order’ has in fact been a reassertion of this same patriarchal order and a further retreat from the rule of law. An independent judiciary is gradually being replaced by a regime in which the ‘true legislative intent’ of law is ultimately determined by the Hong Kong Government and the National People’s Congress. This shift is alarming because the previous colonial administration failed to put into place institutions such as a democratically constituted legislature. Instead, it placed great emphasis on the judiciary as the default institution for delivering both accountability and transparency in Government. That matter in which the post-hand over judiciary was initially tested involved not a commercial dispute, but the matter of a right of abode, which demonstrates a perpetuation of this patriarchal rule.

AB - This paper argues that since the return to Chinese rule in July 1997, the actions of Hong Kong authorities have evidenced a disregard for their obligations under international covenants, as well as for judicial independence. What the administration has referred to as a ‘new constitutional order’ has in fact been a reassertion of this same patriarchal order and a further retreat from the rule of law. An independent judiciary is gradually being replaced by a regime in which the ‘true legislative intent’ of law is ultimately determined by the Hong Kong Government and the National People’s Congress. This shift is alarming because the previous colonial administration failed to put into place institutions such as a democratically constituted legislature. Instead, it placed great emphasis on the judiciary as the default institution for delivering both accountability and transparency in Government. That matter in which the post-hand over judiciary was initially tested involved not a commercial dispute, but the matter of a right of abode, which demonstrates a perpetuation of this patriarchal rule.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/746

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248071115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/157181502761418120

DO - 10.1163/157181502761418120

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 3

SP - 40

EP - 76

JO - Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law

JF - Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law

SN - 1388-1906

IS - 1

ER -