Abstract
In what way can societal actors in transitional polities play a role in influencing bilateral economic agreements? Societal actors are often ignored in the state-centric international relations literature. We, however, contend that social resistance to a foreign development project can reshape the international outcome, even under an asymmetric bargaining structure, if two conditions are met: the host country’s policy options are conditioned by citizens’ resistance; and the home country is eager to continue cooperation. To make this argument, this paper examines the social resistance to the China-backed Letpadaung copper mine in Myanmar amid the host country’s democratisation. Employing a process-tracing technique and drawing upon extensive interviews from 2015–2019, official documents and secondary data, we argue that a popular anti-mining movement transformed a previous state-to-state bargaining process into a two-level game negotiation. As a result, the rise of societal actors was able to disrupt project implementation and extract concessions from China in exchange for project resumption.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2109-2129 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Third World Quarterly |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 29 Aug 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- asymmetric bargaining
- Belt and Road Initiative
- China
- Myanmar
- social movement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Renegotiating Belt and Road cooperation : social resistance in a Sino–Myanmar copper mine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver