Rethinking the Cultural Relations between Hong Kong and China: An Analysis of the Chinese Reception of Stephen Chow’s Films

Matthew Ming-tak CHEW*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This is a cultural sociological study of the mainland Chinese reception of the films of Stephen Chow, the popular Hong Kong actor and director. This study’s theoretical objective is to rethink the cultural relations between post-handover Hong Kong and China. Its empirical analysis challenges five major frameworks of studying post-handover Hong Kong culture that interpret Hong Kong–China cultural relations as hegemonic and conflictual. The study’s first substantive section establishes that the Chinese reception of Chow’s films has been very positive and well participated. The second and third sections illustrate that the Chinese scholarly reception of Chow’s films and the Chinese popular audience reception of them stress their counter-hegemonic characteristics. This study’s data include the hundreds of Chinese-language publications on Chow, online sources, and interviews with twenty-four informants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)785-813
Number of pages29
JournalModern China
Volume48
Issue number4
Early online date2 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

The author is grateful to the informants for their generous help during the data collection process and two anonymous referees for their valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this article. The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Keywords

  • Chinese audiences
  • counter-hegemonic culture
  • Hong Kong–China relations
  • Stephen Chow
  • sub-imperialism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the Cultural Relations between Hong Kong and China: An Analysis of the Chinese Reception of Stephen Chow’s Films'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this