Scientific realism : what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

First, I answer the controversial question ’What is scientific realism?’ with extensive reference to the varied accounts of the position in the literature. Second, I provide an overview of the key developments in the debate concerning scientific realism over the past decade. Third, I provide a summary of the other contributions to this special issue.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-484
Number of pages34
JournalSynthese
Volume196
Issue number2
Early online date7 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

realism
Scientific Realism
literature
Summary

Bibliographical note

I should like to thank Lingnan University for supporting the conference on which this special issue is based, and the attendees of the conference for the discussions that prompted this contribution. I should also like to thank the RGC for funding my recent work on scientific realism (via a Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship, ‘The Instrument of Science’). Finally, I am grateful to Patrick McGivern for useful comments on a previous version of this piece.

Keywords

  • Scientific anti-realism
  • Scientific progress
  • Scientific realism
  • Selective realism

Cite this

@article{57aa699714ae479da30c5c4a17141bff,
title = "Scientific realism : what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions",
abstract = "First, I answer the controversial question ’What is scientific realism?’ with extensive reference to the varied accounts of the position in the literature. Second, I provide an overview of the key developments in the debate concerning scientific realism over the past decade. Third, I provide a summary of the other contributions to this special issue.",
keywords = "Scientific anti-realism, Scientific progress, Scientific realism, Selective realism",
author = "ROWBOTTOM, {Darrell Patrick}",
note = "I should like to thank Lingnan University for supporting the conference on which this special issue is based, and the attendees of the conference for the discussions that prompted this contribution. I should also like to thank the RGC for funding my recent work on scientific realism (via a Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship, ‘The Instrument of Science’). Finally, I am grateful to Patrick McGivern for useful comments on a previous version of this piece.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-017-1484-y",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "451--484",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Scientific realism : what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions. / ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick.

In: Synthese, Vol. 196, No. 2, 28.02.2019, p. 451-484.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific realism : what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions

AU - ROWBOTTOM, Darrell Patrick

N1 - I should like to thank Lingnan University for supporting the conference on which this special issue is based, and the attendees of the conference for the discussions that prompted this contribution. I should also like to thank the RGC for funding my recent work on scientific realism (via a Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship, ‘The Instrument of Science’). Finally, I am grateful to Patrick McGivern for useful comments on a previous version of this piece.

PY - 2019/2/28

Y1 - 2019/2/28

N2 - First, I answer the controversial question ’What is scientific realism?’ with extensive reference to the varied accounts of the position in the literature. Second, I provide an overview of the key developments in the debate concerning scientific realism over the past decade. Third, I provide a summary of the other contributions to this special issue.

AB - First, I answer the controversial question ’What is scientific realism?’ with extensive reference to the varied accounts of the position in the literature. Second, I provide an overview of the key developments in the debate concerning scientific realism over the past decade. Third, I provide a summary of the other contributions to this special issue.

KW - Scientific anti-realism

KW - Scientific progress

KW - Scientific realism

KW - Selective realism

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6702

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026909121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-017-1484-y

DO - 10.1007/s11229-017-1484-y

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 196

SP - 451

EP - 484

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 2

ER -