Sense-Making/Sensemaking

Mei Chun Louisa LAM*, Christine URQUHART, Dervin L. BRENDA

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Sense-making/sensemaking are terms commonly understood as the processes through which people interpret and give meaning to their experiences. The two different terms are used deliberately by their authors with their spelling variations in different academic discourse communities that share some common thrusts. The terms originally focused on the five senses but have expanded in meaning to cover physical, emotional, spiritual, and intuitional responses posited as involved in human sense-makings of their worlds, both internal and external. Since the 1970s, sense-making/sensemaking has been used by researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds, with significant applications in the fields of human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive systems engineering, knowledge management, communication studies, and library/information science (human information behavior). At the highest level of abstraction, the differences in the underlying theories used by researchers can best be understood in tensions between cognitivist and constructivist strands and the focus on either a micro or macro framework. However, because the different streams of attention differ in so many ways (e.g., context, informants, methods, intended audiences, etc.), comparisons are not possible beyond those presented briefly here. It is necessary to understand the historical origins, philosophical assumptions, and methodological roots of five major research approaches labeled as sense-making or sensemaking: Dervin’s sense-making in user studies, human information behavior; Weick’s sensemaking in organizational communication; Snowden’s organizational sense-making in knowledge management; Russell’s sensemaking in HCI; and Klein’s sensemaking in cognitive systems engineering. Applications of the approaches, emerging perspectives, and uses are reviewed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford Bibliographies in Communication
EditorsPatricia MOY
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199756841
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

systems engineering
knowledge management
communication
interaction
abstraction
research approach
information science
discourse
community
experience

Keywords

  • sense-making
  • communication

Cite this

LAM, M. C. L., URQUHART, C., & BRENDA, D. L. (2016). Sense-Making/Sensemaking. In P. MOY (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Communication New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112
LAM, Mei Chun Louisa ; URQUHART, Christine ; BRENDA, Dervin L. / Sense-Making/Sensemaking. Oxford Bibliographies in Communication. editor / Patricia MOY. New York : Oxford University Press, 2016.
@inbook{9f743404ca844d2d8874aeb274391674,
title = "Sense-Making/Sensemaking",
abstract = "Sense-making/sensemaking are terms commonly understood as the processes through which people interpret and give meaning to their experiences. The two different terms are used deliberately by their authors with their spelling variations in different academic discourse communities that share some common thrusts. The terms originally focused on the five senses but have expanded in meaning to cover physical, emotional, spiritual, and intuitional responses posited as involved in human sense-makings of their worlds, both internal and external. Since the 1970s, sense-making/sensemaking has been used by researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds, with significant applications in the fields of human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive systems engineering, knowledge management, communication studies, and library/information science (human information behavior). At the highest level of abstraction, the differences in the underlying theories used by researchers can best be understood in tensions between cognitivist and constructivist strands and the focus on either a micro or macro framework. However, because the different streams of attention differ in so many ways (e.g., context, informants, methods, intended audiences, etc.), comparisons are not possible beyond those presented briefly here. It is necessary to understand the historical origins, philosophical assumptions, and methodological roots of five major research approaches labeled as sense-making or sensemaking: Dervin’s sense-making in user studies, human information behavior; Weick’s sensemaking in organizational communication; Snowden’s organizational sense-making in knowledge management; Russell’s sensemaking in HCI; and Klein’s sensemaking in cognitive systems engineering. Applications of the approaches, emerging perspectives, and uses are reviewed.",
keywords = "sense-making, communication",
author = "LAM, {Mei Chun Louisa} and Christine URQUHART and BRENDA, {Dervin L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112",
language = "English",
editor = "Patricia MOY",
booktitle = "Oxford Bibliographies in Communication",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

LAM, MCL, URQUHART, C & BRENDA, DL 2016, Sense-Making/Sensemaking. in P MOY (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Communication. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112

Sense-Making/Sensemaking. / LAM, Mei Chun Louisa; URQUHART, Christine; BRENDA, Dervin L.

Oxford Bibliographies in Communication. ed. / Patricia MOY. New York : Oxford University Press, 2016.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sense-Making/Sensemaking

AU - LAM, Mei Chun Louisa

AU - URQUHART, Christine

AU - BRENDA, Dervin L.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Sense-making/sensemaking are terms commonly understood as the processes through which people interpret and give meaning to their experiences. The two different terms are used deliberately by their authors with their spelling variations in different academic discourse communities that share some common thrusts. The terms originally focused on the five senses but have expanded in meaning to cover physical, emotional, spiritual, and intuitional responses posited as involved in human sense-makings of their worlds, both internal and external. Since the 1970s, sense-making/sensemaking has been used by researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds, with significant applications in the fields of human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive systems engineering, knowledge management, communication studies, and library/information science (human information behavior). At the highest level of abstraction, the differences in the underlying theories used by researchers can best be understood in tensions between cognitivist and constructivist strands and the focus on either a micro or macro framework. However, because the different streams of attention differ in so many ways (e.g., context, informants, methods, intended audiences, etc.), comparisons are not possible beyond those presented briefly here. It is necessary to understand the historical origins, philosophical assumptions, and methodological roots of five major research approaches labeled as sense-making or sensemaking: Dervin’s sense-making in user studies, human information behavior; Weick’s sensemaking in organizational communication; Snowden’s organizational sense-making in knowledge management; Russell’s sensemaking in HCI; and Klein’s sensemaking in cognitive systems engineering. Applications of the approaches, emerging perspectives, and uses are reviewed.

AB - Sense-making/sensemaking are terms commonly understood as the processes through which people interpret and give meaning to their experiences. The two different terms are used deliberately by their authors with their spelling variations in different academic discourse communities that share some common thrusts. The terms originally focused on the five senses but have expanded in meaning to cover physical, emotional, spiritual, and intuitional responses posited as involved in human sense-makings of their worlds, both internal and external. Since the 1970s, sense-making/sensemaking has been used by researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds, with significant applications in the fields of human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive systems engineering, knowledge management, communication studies, and library/information science (human information behavior). At the highest level of abstraction, the differences in the underlying theories used by researchers can best be understood in tensions between cognitivist and constructivist strands and the focus on either a micro or macro framework. However, because the different streams of attention differ in so many ways (e.g., context, informants, methods, intended audiences, etc.), comparisons are not possible beyond those presented briefly here. It is necessary to understand the historical origins, philosophical assumptions, and methodological roots of five major research approaches labeled as sense-making or sensemaking: Dervin’s sense-making in user studies, human information behavior; Weick’s sensemaking in organizational communication; Snowden’s organizational sense-making in knowledge management; Russell’s sensemaking in HCI; and Klein’s sensemaking in cognitive systems engineering. Applications of the approaches, emerging perspectives, and uses are reviewed.

KW - sense-making

KW - communication

UR - https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/obo/page/communication

U2 - 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112

DO - 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112

M3 - Book Chapter

BT - Oxford Bibliographies in Communication

A2 - MOY, Patricia

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - New York

ER -

LAM MCL, URQUHART C, BRENDA DL. Sense-Making/Sensemaking. In MOY P, editor, Oxford Bibliographies in Communication. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0112